Re: [Cppcms-users] State of the Union

[Artyom B. <art...@ya...>]

>________________________________
> From: Tomáš Volf <vol...@gm...>
>To: Cpp...@li... 
>Sent: Monday, June 29, 2015 4:01 PM
>Subject: [Cppcms-users] State of the Union
> 
>
>Greetings all,
>I'm new here, so I will speak a bit. I was so far interested in Wt,
>since I have Qt background and it was quite familiar. But it's getting
>more and more annoying. So I looked around and found CppCMS. Which
>honestly looks good. I would like to ask just three questions:
>
>1) How does CppCMS compare to Wt in matter of performance for high
>number of concurrent users? Concrete deployment would be FastCGI
>behind nginx if that's relevant.

>

Wt was never build with performance in mind. Stuff like caching,
and scaling is integrated part of the CppCMS that were from the
beginning there.

Look at this: http://blog.cppcms.com/post/114

Another thing is the philosophy of the design. I started CppCMS
when Wt was around as its concept of "GUI" design is wrong IMHO.

You want interactive and efficient GUI - use client side javascript
technology and combine it with solid backed - making it "integrated"
is just wrong.
>2) How is development of CppCMS looking? Last commit seems to be over
>two months old (20th of april). Is this project still active in any
>meaningful way?

>

Yes it is
>3) Was moving project from sourceforge and svn to let's say github and
>git ever considered?


You got the correct answer by other list members.

I got some great contributions using patches - so I don't buy "github"
makes it easier - what makes it easier is actually developing stuff
and so far I don't see much besides talking.

Moving to git would break many existing tools. Also svn works great
for branching merging and other things and it suits this project very well.
>Thanks for answers,
>Tomas Volf
>





Artyom Beilis 
-------------- 
CppCMS - C++ Web Framework:   http://cppcms.com/ 
CppDB - C++ SQL Connectivity: http://cppcms.com/sql/cppdb/