Re: [Cppcms-users] Continued discussion on bug 3536452 - transaction in progress

[<ele...@ex...>]

Here is another idea.

1) Create a cppdb::base_transaction class and implement the current
cppdb::transaction in it, but without calling begin() in it's constructor.

Make its functions/destructor virtual if users want to overload & support
polymorphism.

2) Make cppdb::transaction inherit from base_transaction and call
session::begin() in it's constructor, so that current behavior is kept and
there wont be any API breakage.

3) Users will then be able to inherit from cppdb::base_transaction and
create their own transaction classes.

This should avoid adding a default constructor and possibly confuse users.

Is this a solid proposal Artyom?