Re: [Cppcms-users] cppcms unclear issues and philosophy

[Markus R. <us...@ma...>]

Hi!

Artyom Beilis wrote:
> No, because if I use boost under the hood user will still have
> ABI incompatibilities. For example I use some boost code
> under hidden cppcms_boost namespace (boost with renamed namespace)
> but it is not exposed and I have to use alternative namespace

Could you explain why this hidden cppcms_boost namespace is needed? In which
situation does it differ to static linkage?

> Even if boost is not in interface you will have ABI problems
> if somebody accidentally uses for example boost.1.46.1 instead
> of boost.1.46 that cppcms is compiled with...

Of course, but is changing the namespace needed to tackle this issue?

Do you use tools/rename.py for the renaming?

best regards
Markus