Re: [Cppcms-users] versioning scheme

[Artyom B. <art...@ya...>]

> 
> 
> I'd still prefer a somewhat simpler versioning scheme, but what you propose 
> at 
> least has a logical explanation and a practical meaning, so that's good. 
> 
> Here you are:
> http://art-blog.no-ip.info/wikipp/en/page/cppcms_versioning_scheme
> 
> 
> Blessings,
> 
> Augustin.
> 

Wow...

Thanks for updating the wiki.


The naming convention is the same convention used
by Gnome and by GLib. It is very suitable for libraries
as it is clear what kind of dependency required and
what library is backward compatible with other and at
what level.

Artyom