Re: [Cppcms-users] versioning scheme

[augustin <aug...@ov...>]

On Sunday, September 04, 2011 05:16:07 PM Artyom Beilis wrote:
> Once CppCMS released in version 1.0.0 the major versions would look like
> 
> [Major].[Minor].[Patch]
> 
> Major - defines API and ABI compatibility it expected to be 1 for a
>         long time. Release of 2.0.0 would mean a major API changes.
> 
>         Not planned at this point.
> 
> Minor - Releases that adds new features and functionality such that:
> 
>         all that works with 1.0 would work with 1.2 but not other way
>         around.
> 
>         The even numbers would mark stable releases 1.0, 1.2, 1.4
>         and odd numbers would mark development releases 1.1, 1.3 that
>         would become on stable release +1 1.1 -> 1.2 and 1.3->1.4
>         upon release.
> 
> Patch - bug fix release that do not change API.
> 
> The 0.99.X and 0.999.X version scheme is a beta-X and RC-X pre-release
> scheme - i.e. pre 1.0.0. version


I'd still prefer a somewhat simpler versioning scheme, but what you propose at 
least has a logical explanation and a practical meaning, so that's good. 

Here you are:
http://art-blog.no-ip.info/wikipp/en/page/cppcms_versioning_scheme


Blessings,

Augustin.



-- 
Friends: http://www.reuniting.info/
My projects:
http://astralcity.org/ http://3enjeux.overshoot.tv/ http://linux.overshoot.tv/ 
http://overshoot.tv/ http://charityware.info/ http://masquilier.org/
http://openteacher.info/ http://minguo.info/ 
http://www.wechange.org/ http://searching911.info/












.