Re: [Cppcms-users] Cppcms-users Digest, Vol 13, Issue 2

[Artyom <art...@ya...>]

Yes, indeed, CppCMS 1.x is much better:

- Better and Reacher API
- Better Unit test coverage
- Simpler installation
- Better OS support.
- Even It is still beta, it is quite stable one and I think it is
  even less buggy then CppCMS 0.x, but its API is still evolving.

So at this point I could even declare CppCMS 1.x.x as "stable version"
but the API and ABI can't be considered stable.

When CppCMS 1.x.x will be release it would be ABI stable till 
next release so this is why I still don't make an official stable
release.

But these are points that CppCMS users should be aware of.

In any case I have a big question:

  How many of you using CppCMS 1.x.x beta and how many of you
  are using CppCMS 0.0.x?

Maybe it is better to declare CppCMS 1.x.x branch as stable and release
versions 0.99.X that would be considered as stable with evolving API?

Regards,
  Artyom