Re: [Cppcms-users] Compilation errors using gcc 4.5 and c++0x

[Stanimir M. <sta...@zo...>]

Yes, but using C++0x gives much benefits already and it is really good
that you support it to some extend already.
Something that already was discussed, is the deprecation of auto_ptr
in favor of unique_ptr. At the moment c++0x is enabled,  a warning
about this is emitted. Is it possible to substitute auto_ptr to
unique_ptr the same way you do with auto and __typeof__?

It is not a big deal but it looks much better this way.

Stanimir

On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 10:44 PM, Artyom <art...@ya...> wrote:
>>
>> Actually, CppCms compiles fine without the --std=c++0x
>> flag. I saw you
>> are using the auto keyword in the templates loops if
>> available and
>> since I am using it too, decided to give it to CppCms
>> also.
>
> Note, I don't really need C++0x mode to get nice way to iterate
> over collections.
>
> Under gcc, intel and even SunStudo (I used to support)
> compilers I have typeof or __typeof__ which is very close to decltype
> so auto is not so necessary, but still I'm really looking forward
> for it in all modern compilers as for C++0x at all.
>
> If today C++0x was supported by most compilers I would not need
> half of Booster today.
>
> Regards
>  Artyom
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
> What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone?
> Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first
> _______________________________________________
> Cppcms-users mailing list
> Cpp...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cppcms-users
>