Re: [Cppcms-users] cppcms build problems

[Markus R. <us...@ma...>]

Artyom wrote:

> To be honest, this tool is not missing only in Web development.
> The situation with Localization is quite bad in any areas.

Wow, I am impressed what you already achieved! boost.locale is really
missing - and you are doing a great job and it seems like you have a lot of
experience in that field.


I see that you use cmake for boost.locale - are you planning to use it for
cppcms too? Some features are very convenient:
- separate build directory
- far less required files in root (cppcms 0.0.4 has everything in root -
together with autotools this situation is not optimal)
- cpack makes e.g. deb packages for local install
- dependency tracking is very good
- a CMakeLists.txt per directory
- and best of all - cppcms could be easily copied as subproject into
projects using it, without running configure twice :-)

The last point is of course not very important once cppcms is available as
package in major distros. Of course there are also many pros for
autotools - I am just asking.

thank you
Markus