cppcms-users

[Cppcms-users] Is someone interested in CppCms participating on this Web Framework benchmark?

[Alessandro S. <ast...@gm...>]

Some Java Programmers (from TechEmpower) are doing some Web Framework
Benchmarks,

Right now they're on the 4 round,

Reddit discussion:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1dk2am/web_framework_benchmarks_round_4/
BlogPost:
http://www.techempower.com/blog/2013/05/02/frameworks-round-4/
Results:
http://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#section=data-r4

There's no C++ Web Framework yet, and the author told me it was because he
was not confident on writing a fair C++ entry due to inexperience in the
language:

"Just so it's out there, we (I am a senior programmer at TechEmpower) did
not *choose* to not include any C++ web frameworks; we are a primarily Java
shop and so no one was really comfortable with the idea of writing a test
for one of the C++ frameworks we saw because we are not experts with the
language. Personally, I would never sign my name next to a C++ app I wrote
that was going to be public facing; I'm just not confident enough with the
language to know, like I do with Java, that I was getting it right.

All that being said, *anyone* is welcome to issue a pull request with a new
language/framework test and (provided it meets all the requirements of the
tests) we will add it to the next round of benchmarks."

I'm also very inexperienced in both C++ and CppCMS (but I love both ; ] ),
as such I'm not qualified implementing the test case.

The author of Wt might implement the test case for the next Benchmark
iteration:

"Wt author here, we would like to see Wt included; it would only be
benchmarking 0.1% of it (nothing related to its widgets or rendering) but
still it would give us some insight in how our http server, ORM and
template engine is doing. We'll try to implement the test cases, if you are
willing to include them?"

I'm sending this shootout because it would be great to see CppCMS on the
benchmark!

Re: [Cppcms-users] Is someone interested in CppCms participating on this Web Framework benchmark?

[Sergey <ser...@gm...>]

http://cppcms.com/wikipp/en/page/benchmarks_all

p.s: 1-2 years ago I was looking at Wt (C + +) and mongoose (C). But then I 
found cppcms and he was in my opinion much better and easier. cppcms (v> 1.x) 
is very easy to learn. Write as large and small projects it easy, at least 
easier than Wt. The author is smart and friendly. He is always ready to help 
in any matter. For me cppcms it is a matter of taste.

Re: [Cppcms-users] Is someone interested in CppCms participating on this Web Framework benchmark?

[Artyom B. <art...@ya...>]

I had seen this benchmarks "game"

Two points:


	1. It has nothing to do with real programming and measures very small factors - when we measure a real application the difference become more significant
	2. I had no time to prepare the benchmark.

If someone willing to write a benchmark I'll gladly review the code to make sure it works as fast as possible.
 
Artyom Beilis
--------------
CppCMS - C++ Web Framework:   http://cppcms.com/
CppDB - C++ SQL Connectivity: http://cppcms.com/sql/cppdb/



>________________________________
> From: Alessandro Stamatto <ast...@gm...>
>To: cpp...@li... 
>Sent: Friday, May 3, 2013 8:36 PM
>Subject: [Cppcms-users] Is someone interested in CppCms participating on this Web Framework benchmark?
> 
>
>
>Some Java Programmers (from TechEmpower) are doing some Web Framework Benchmarks,
>
>Right now they're on the 4 round,
>
>
>Reddit discussion: http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1dk2am/web_framework_benchmarks_round_4/
>BlogPost:
>http://www.techempower.com/blog/2013/05/02/frameworks-round-4/
>Results:
>http://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#section=data-r4
>
>There's no C++ Web Framework yet, and the author told me it was because he was not confident on writing a fair C++ entry due to inexperience in the language:
>
>"Just so it's out there, we (I am a senior programmer at TechEmpower) did not choose to not include any C++ web frameworks; we are a primarily Java shop and so no one was really comfortable with the idea of writing a test for one of the C++ frameworks we saw because we are not experts with the language. Personally, I would never sign my name next to a C++ app I wrote that was going to be public facing; I'm just not confident enough with the language to know, like I do with Java, that I was getting it right.
>All that being said, anyone is welcome to issue a pull request with a new language/framework test and (provided it meets all the requirements of the tests) we will add it to the next round of benchmarks."
>
>I'm also very inexperienced in both C++ and CppCMS (but I love both ; ] ), as such I'm not qualified implementing the test case. 
>
>The author of Wt might implement the test case for the next Benchmark iteration:
>
>"Wt author here, we would like to see Wt included; it would only be benchmarking 0.1% of it (nothing related to its widgets or rendering) but still it would give us some insight in how our http server, ORM and template engine is doing. We'll try to implement the test cases, if you are willing to include them?"
>
>I'm sending this shootout because it would be great to see CppCMS on the benchmark!
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite
>It's a free troubleshooting tool designed for production
>Get down to code-level detail for bottlenecks, with <2% overhead.
>Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes.
>http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_ap2
>_______________________________________________
>Cppcms-users mailing list
>Cpp...@li...
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cppcms-users
>
>
>