cppcms-users

[Cppcms-users] compiling

[Yiown S. <yi...@gm...>]

Hi Artyom,

I just did a clean svn checkout and tried to compile the project.

The file cppcms_boost/bind.hpp is no longer in the repository.
But some files still tries to include it.

In some of these files i saw a preprocessor flag CPPCMS_USE_EXTERNAL_BOOST
which bypass the include and instead includes the normal boost version of
the bind.hpp.

So i placed the flag in the compilation and still some of the files would
not compile,
since they do not even check for the preprocessor flag. The files are:
private/prefork_acceptor.h
src/http_api.cpp
src/session_pool.cpp
src/tcp_cache_server.cpp
Once i updated these files with the preprocessor directives it compiled ok.

It looks like cppcms_boost/bind.hpp was removed by accident,
or the include points were not updated.

In any case. Hope this helps.

Regards.

Re: [Cppcms-users] compiling

[Marcel H. <ke...@co...>]

did you
> tar xvf cppcms_boost.tar.bz2
?

http://cppcms.com/wikipp/en/page/cppcms_1x_build

Regards

Re: [Cppcms-users] compiling

[Yiown S. <yi...@gm...>]

No, i did:
svn co https://svn.code.sf.net/p/cppcms/code/framework/trunk cppcms



On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 11:59 AM, Marcel Hellwig <ke...@co...> wrote:

> did you
> > tar xvf cppcms_boost.tar.bz2
> ?
>
> http://cppcms.com/wikipp/en/page/cppcms_1x_build
>
> Regards
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> How ServiceNow helps IT people transform IT departments:
> 1. A cloud service to automate IT design, transition and operations
> 2. Dashboards that offer high-level views of enterprise services
> 3. A single system of record for all IT processes
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/servicenow-d2d-j
> _______________________________________________
> Cppcms-users mailing list
> Cpp...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cppcms-users
>
>

Re: [Cppcms-users] compiling

[Marcel H. <ke...@co...>]

see the link i provided

Re: [Cppcms-users] compiling

[Yiown S. <yi...@gm...>]

Perfect! you are right i didn't extracted the tar file. can that be
automated?
In the other hand i am getting these test failing:
         23 - internal_forwarder_test (Failed)
         24 - forwarder_test (Failed)
         27 - http_timeouts_test_write (Failed)

Thanks Marcel.


On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Marcel Hellwig <ke...@co...> wrote:

> see the link i provided
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> How ServiceNow helps IT people transform IT departments:
> 1. A cloud service to automate IT design, transition and operations
> 2. Dashboards that offer high-level views of enterprise services
> 3. A single system of record for all IT processes
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/servicenow-d2d-j
> _______________________________________________
> Cppcms-users mailing list
> Cpp...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cppcms-users
>
>

Re: [Cppcms-users] compiling

[Marcel H. <ke...@co...>]

On 06.06.2013 17:22, Yiown Sugpo wrote:
> Perfect! you are right i didn't extracted the tar file. can that be
> automated?
> In the other hand i am getting these test failing:
>          23 - internal_forwarder_test (Failed)
>          24 - forwarder_test (Failed)
>          27 - http_timeouts_test_write (Failed)
>
> Thanks Marcel.
I think this is a known bug. But you could provide further information
about this with
> ctest -v --output-on-failure

Regards

Re: [Cppcms-users] compiling

[<un...@fu...>]

On 2013-06-06 17:22, Yiown Sugpo wrote:
> Perfect! you are right i didn't extracted the tar file. can that be 
> automated?

feel free to customize attached script to your needs.

Re: [Cppcms-users] compiling

[Marcel H. <ke...@co...>]

make -j16 is much to high!
some say cores * 2, some just say cores... I prefer cores ;) but 16?

Regards

Re: [Cppcms-users] compiling

[Yiown S. <yi...@gm...>]

i have 8 cores but no noticeable difference found after -j6 .
i guess the individual threads are too short lived, at least while
compiling cppcms.


On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 5:57 PM, Marcel Hellwig <ke...@co...> wrote:

> make -j16 is much to high!
> some say cores * 2, some just say cores... I prefer cores ;) but 16?
>
> Regards
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> How ServiceNow helps IT people transform IT departments:
> 1. A cloud service to automate IT design, transition and operations
> 2. Dashboards that offer high-level views of enterprise services
> 3. A single system of record for all IT processes
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/servicenow-d2d-j
> _______________________________________________
> Cppcms-users mailing list
> Cpp...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cppcms-users
>
>

Re: [Cppcms-users] compiling

[<un...@fu...>]

On 2013-06-06 22:57, Marcel Hellwig wrote:
> make -j16 is much to high!
> some say cores * 2, some just say cores... I prefer cores ;) but 16?

true, todays linux scheduler does much better job, so cores*2 isn't 
necessary. even more with ssd low io latency and intel's virtual cores. 
8 would do the job.

thank you for pointing