cppcms-users

[Cppcms-users] Question about multiples mount_point

[Joffrey R. <jof...@ya...>]

Hello,

I'm working on a cppcms project with asynchronous classes :

Is that the right way to create my asynchronous modules ?

<code>
*int main(int argc, char **argv, char **env)*
{
    try {
*      cppcms::service srv(argc,argv);

       booster::intrusive_ptr<ad_connection> c
          = new ad_connection(srv);
       srv.applications_pool().mount(
          c, cppcms::mount_point("/ad_connection/(.*)",1) );

       srv.applications_pool().mount(
          cppcms::applications_factory<program>(),
          cppcms::mount_point("^/((?:(?!ad_connection/).)*)",1) );

       srv.run();*
    }
    catch(std::exception const &e) {
*      std::cerr<<e.what()<<std::endl;*
    }
}
</code>

The code works well, but just for curiosity, I wondered if it was the 
right way..

Thanks,

Joffrey

Re: [Cppcms-users] Question about multiples mount_point

[Marcel H. <ke...@co...>]

look at the chat example. what you are doing looks.. .. interesting (:

regards 
-- 
Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail gesendet.



Joffrey Romero <jof...@ya...> schrieb:

Hello,

I'm working on a cppcms project with asynchronous classes :

Is that the right way to create my asynchronous modules ?

<code>
int main(int argc, char **argv, char **env)
{
   try {
      cppcms::service srv(argc,argv);

      booster::intrusive_ptr<ad_connection> c
         = new ad_connection(srv);
      srv.applications_pool().mount(
         c, cppcms::mount_point("/ad_connection/(.*)",1) );
        
      srv.applications_pool().mount(
         cppcms::applications_factory<program>(),
         cppcms::mount_point("^/((?:(?!ad_connection/).)*)",1) );

      srv.run();
   }
   catch(std::exception const &e) {
      std::cerr<<e.what()<<std::endl;
   }
}
</code>

The code works well, but just for curiosity, I wondered if it was the right way..

Thanks,

Joffrey

Re: [Cppcms-users] Question about multiples mount_point

[Artyom B. <art...@ya...>]

Hello,


Yes it is Ok, I don't see any specific problems with this.

Mount point gives you large flexibility, this it was
designed for - mount multiple applications

Note: please register to this mailing list so I would
not have to approve your messages and you will receive
replays.


Artyom Beilis
-------------

Support CppCMS by donating money:
https://sourceforge.net/donate/index.php?group_id=20996





>________________________________
> From: Joffrey Romero <jof...@ya...>
>To: cpp...@li... 
>Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 8:33 AM
>Subject: [Cppcms-users] Question about multiples mount_point
> 
>
>Hello,
>
>I'm working on a cppcms project with asynchronous classes :
>
>Is that the right way to create my asynchronous modules ?
>
><code>
>int main(int argc, char **argv, char **env)
>{
>   try {
>      cppcms::service srv(argc,argv);
>
>      booster::intrusive_ptr<ad_connection> c
>         = new ad_connection(srv);
>      srv.applications_pool().mount(
>         c, cppcms::mount_point("/ad_connection/(.*)",1) );
>        
>      srv.applications_pool().mount(
>         cppcms::applications_factory<program>(),
>         cppcms::mount_point("^/((?:(?!ad_connection/).)*)",1) );
>
>      srv.run();
>   }
>   catch(std::exception const &e) {
>      std::cerr<<e.what()<<std::endl;
>   }
>}
></code>
>
>The code works well, but just for curiosity, I wondered if it was
    the right way..
>
>Thanks,
>
>Joffrey
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Virtualization & Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning
>Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing 
>also focuses on allowing computing to be delivered as a service.
>http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51521223/
>_______________________________________________
>Cppcms-users mailing list
>Cpp...@li...
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cppcms-users
>
>
>