Thread: [Cppcms-users] CppCMS code migrated to GitHub
Brought to you by:
artyom-beilis
From: Artyom B. <art...@gm...> - 2017-03-01 07:18:29
|
After multiple requests and my final decision the CppCMS web framework code migrated to GitHub https://github.com/artyom-beilis/cppcms Please note: 1. Only CppCMS framework migrated, other subprojects like CppDB or Wikipp are still pending conversion 2. The main bug tracker is still on source-forge - however I'll relate to issues opened on GitHub Regards, Artyom Beilis |
From: Shiv S. D. <shi...@gm...> - 2017-03-01 07:48:01
|
Yes!!! On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 12:48 PM, Artyom Beilis <art...@gm...> wrote: > After multiple requests and my final decision the CppCMS web framework > code migrated to GitHub > > https://github.com/artyom-beilis/cppcms > > Please note: > > 1. Only CppCMS framework migrated, other subprojects like CppDB or > Wikipp are still pending conversion > 2. The main bug tracker is still on source-forge - however I'll relate > to issues opened on GitHub > > Regards, > Artyom Beilis > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > ------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > Cppcms-users mailing list > Cpp...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cppcms-users > -- Respect, Shiv Shankar Dayal |
From: Hery M. <hma...@gm...> - 2017-03-02 13:34:13
|
Yes and thanks a lot. 2017-03-01 10:18 GMT+03:00 Artyom Beilis <art...@gm...>: > After multiple requests and my final decision the CppCMS web framework > code migrated to GitHub > > https://github.com/artyom-beilis/cppcms > > Please note: > > 1. Only CppCMS framework migrated, other subprojects like CppDB or > Wikipp are still pending conversion > 2. The main bug tracker is still on source-forge - however I'll relate > to issues opened on GitHub > > Regards, > Artyom Beilis > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > ------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > Cppcms-users mailing list > Cpp...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cppcms-users > |
From: CN <cn...@fa...> - 2017-03-02 16:42:49
|
On Wed, Mar 1, 2017, at 03:18 PM, Artyom Beilis wrote: > After multiple requests and my final decision the CppCMS web framework > code migrated to GitHub > > https://github.com/artyom-beilis/cppcms > I voted star just now. > 1. Only CppCMS framework migrated, other subprojects like CppDB or > Wikipp are still pending conversion My local version of CppDB enabled with bool data type has been running smoothly for some time without problem. Once CppDB is also there and after I have learned how to use GitHub, I will try to send a pull request for this patch. However, there is one problem: Because I do not have experience on any back end except PostgreSQL, I can add this data type only to PostgreSQL. Such half done work will apparently break the project making it unable to compile for other back ends. Any thoughts are welcome! Best Regards, CN -- http://www.fastmail.com - Send your email first class |
From: Artyom B. <art...@gm...> - 2017-03-03 22:37:33
|
Bool is tricky as it isn't native for many DBs. In any case cppdb is still in svn. So it'll take some time. You can always prepare a patch and I'll integrate it. One thing - adding bool would break ABI so I need new to release a new major version so I may also consider adding some more features currently not present in CppDB - like C++11 support etc. Artyom > My local version of CppDB enabled with bool data type has been running > smoothly for some time without problem. Once CppDB is also there and > after I have learned how to use GitHub, I will try to send a pull > request for this patch. > > However, there is one problem: Because I do not have experience on any > back end except PostgreSQL, I can add this data type only to PostgreSQL. > Such half done work will apparently break the project making it unable > to compile for other back ends. > Any thoughts are welcome! > > Best Regards, > CN > > -- > http://www.fastmail.com - Send your email first class > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > Cppcms-users mailing list > Cpp...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cppcms-users |
From: Nazım C. B. <naz...@ne...> - 2017-03-02 16:49:02
|
Not specific to your mail, but I just don't understand what was preventing people to send patch from Sourceforge? It was even possible to open/comment tickets on Sourceforge, but not possible with GitHub (which one I am not going to create an account in any way). On 02/03/17 19:42, CN wrote: > On Wed, Mar 1, 2017, at 03:18 PM, Artyom Beilis wrote: >> After multiple requests and my final decision the CppCMS web framework >> code migrated to GitHub >> >> https://github.com/artyom-beilis/cppcms >> > I voted star just now. > >> 1. Only CppCMS framework migrated, other subprojects like CppDB or >> Wikipp are still pending conversion > My local version of CppDB enabled with bool data type has been running > smoothly for some time without problem. Once CppDB is also there and > after I have learned how to use GitHub, I will try to send a pull > request for this patch. > > However, there is one problem: Because I do not have experience on any > back end except PostgreSQL, I can add this data type only to PostgreSQL. > Such half done work will apparently break the project making it unable > to compile for other back ends. > Any thoughts are welcome! > > Best Regards, > CN > |
From: Artyom B. <art...@gm...> - 2017-03-03 22:40:03
|
Nothing, I accepted patch files without any problems :-) Just svn become less popular in comparison to GIT and... I had my own reasons unrelated to community requests or to quality of svn vs git. Artyom On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 6:48 PM, Nazım Can Bedir <naz...@ne...> wrote: > Not specific to your mail, but I just don't understand what was > preventing people to send patch from Sourceforge? It was even possible > to open/comment tickets on Sourceforge, but not possible with GitHub > (which one I am not going to create an account in any way). > > > On 02/03/17 19:42, CN wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 1, 2017, at 03:18 PM, Artyom Beilis wrote: >>> After multiple requests and my final decision the CppCMS web framework >>> code migrated to GitHub >>> >>> https://github.com/artyom-beilis/cppcms >>> >> I voted star just now. >> >>> 1. Only CppCMS framework migrated, other subprojects like CppDB or >>> Wikipp are still pending conversion >> My local version of CppDB enabled with bool data type has been running >> smoothly for some time without problem. Once CppDB is also there and >> after I have learned how to use GitHub, I will try to send a pull >> request for this patch. >> >> However, there is one problem: Because I do not have experience on any >> back end except PostgreSQL, I can add this data type only to PostgreSQL. >> Such half done work will apparently break the project making it unable >> to compile for other back ends. >> Any thoughts are welcome! >> >> Best Regards, >> CN >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > Cppcms-users mailing list > Cpp...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cppcms-users |
From: CN <cn...@fa...> - 2017-03-03 05:41:43
|
On Fri, Mar 3, 2017, at 12:48 AM, Nazım Can Bedir wrote: > Not specific to your mail, but I just don't understand what was > preventing people to send patch from Sourceforge? It was even possible > to open/comment tickets on Sourceforge, but not possible with GitHub > (which one I am not going to create an account in any way). I speak only for myself. Sourceforge does not in any way prevent me from sending my patch. I have not done it only because: 1. My patch is only a minor improvement. 2. As mentioned in my previous message, my half done patch makes me hesitate to show it under sunlight. My real intention for sending out previous message has two fold: 1. to solicit this community to work with me to complete this patch, or even better: 2. to encourage someone more competent than myself to complete the task by himself/herself alone. By the way, please pardon me for derail the topic! Nowadays perhaps dozens of "cutting edge" new services and technologies emerge almost every day. As a result, considering my age, I am often reluctant to learn so many new stuffs. However, I am just curious what makes you not to create an account in GitHub? Have you seen some weakness in its services? In fact I am studying the possibilities of leveraging Gitlab's services for myself. Best Regards, CN -- http://www.fastmail.com - The professional email service |
From: CN <cn...@fa...> - 2017-03-03 09:54:33
|
On Fri, Mar 3, 2017, at 03:43 PM, Nazım Can Bedir wrote: > About the GitHub, > > This is probably related with my age [I am from floppy era, :)] and > my political view (which is very close to BSD philosophy); but I > don't like GitHub because, Hi! Interesting! What were the dimension of those *diskettes* you used to have? Mine were 5.25" in diameter. I throw them into trash collector about 3 years ago, at last. That action was really a big relief in terms of both living space and mental state. However, I still keep several 3.5" ones for no obvious reason. > But I had first-hand experiences with on-premise GitLab installation > (both Community and Enterprise Edition). And if you are using Git DVCS > as a primary development tool, I can really recommend GitLab. At the > worst case, you have an option to reach Dimitri (the original creator > and current CTO of GitLab) via online channels and get a reply (as we > can do same with Artyom). Thanks for sharing the precious experience! Coincidentally I registered an account in Gitlab 2 days ago. It looks to me that I will have to learn both Github and Gitlab. I have a feeling that it is more or less inhuman for an old man to suffer torture like that. Best Regards, CN -- http://www.fastmail.com - Send your email first class |
From: Nazım C. B. <naz...@ne...> - 2017-03-03 10:23:57
|
Hi, Well I am not from that far, mine was 3.5" :)) I used 5.25" ones only in high-school computer lab. If you can use Facebook, Twitter, or any other social networking website; then it's not too much different from those. In normal cases, 90% of coding is done with your own development environment; and the web interface is mostly used for social interaction with other developers and end-users (like issue management, code review, brainstorming, visually navigating Git history, etc.). Best wishes, Nazim Can. On 03/03/17 12:54, CN wrote: > On Fri, Mar 3, 2017, at 03:43 PM, Nazım Can Bedir wrote: >> About the GitHub, >> >> This is probably related with my age [I am from floppy era, :)] and >> my political view (which is very close to BSD philosophy); but I >> don't like GitHub because, > > Hi! Interesting! What were the dimension of those *diskettes* you used > to have? Mine were 5.25" in diameter. I throw them into trash > collector about 3 years ago, at last. That action was really a big > relief in terms of both living space and mental state. However, I > still keep several 3.5" ones for no obvious reason. > >> But I had first-hand experiences with on-premise GitLab installation >> (both Community and Enterprise Edition). And if you are using Git >> DVCS as a primary development tool, I can really recommend GitLab. At >> the worst case, you have an option to reach Dimitri (the original >> creator and current CTO of GitLab) via online channels and get a >> reply (as we can do same with Artyom). >> > > Thanks for sharing the precious experience! > Coincidentally I registered an account in Gitlab 2 days ago. It looks > to me that I will have to learn both Github and Gitlab. I have a > feeling that it is more or less inhuman for an old man to suffer > torture like that. > > Best Regards, > CN > -- > http://www.fastmail.com - Send your email first class > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > > > _______________________________________________ > Cppcms-users mailing list > Cpp...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cppcms-users |
From: CN <cn...@fa...> - 2017-03-04 18:11:22
|
On Fri, Mar 3, 2017, at 03:43 PM, Nazım Can Bedir wrote: > And about your patch, if you can share your patch in PostgreSQL > backend; there is a chance that I may help you about the other > backends. Hi! Since it will take a while to see CppDB moved to Github according to Artyom, I can't wait to send the patch to Sourceforge. Hopefully it will be accepted and then someone else will take over the rest of the dirty half done job :-) Best Regards, CN -- http://www.fastmail.com - A no graphics, no pop-ups email service |
From: Nazım C. B. <naz...@ne...> - 2017-03-04 18:17:22
|
Artyom, Could you share your thoughts about the patch? If you think you may consider accepting the proposal, I accept to provide patch for other backends (if it's required). Regards, Nazim Can. On 04/03/17 21:11, CN wrote: > On Fri, Mar 3, 2017, at 03:43 PM, Nazım Can Bedir wrote: >> >> And about your patch, if you can share your patch in PostgreSQL >> backend; there is a chance that I may help you about the other backends. >> > > Hi! > > Since it will take a while to see CppDB moved to Github according to > Artyom, I can't wait to send the patch to Sourceforge. Hopefully it > will be accepted and then someone else will take over the rest of the > dirty half done job :-) > > Best Regards, > CN > -- > http://www.fastmail.com - A no graphics, no pop-ups email service > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > > > _______________________________________________ > Cppcms-users mailing list > Cpp...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cppcms-users |
From: Hery M. <hma...@gm...> - 2017-04-18 08:54:11
|
Hi Artyom, I don't undestand the code meanning below within class application_specific_pool::_async_legacy_policy. It concerns the put(application *app) function: {....... virtual void put(application *app) { if(!app) return; delete app; app_ = 0; self_->flags(-1); } application *app_; } Could you explain why you delete app and do app_ = 0 instead of app_= app ; app = 0; Thank you; Hery. 2017-03-01 10:18 GMT+03:00 Artyom Beilis <art...@gm...>: > After multiple requests and my final decision the CppCMS web framework > code migrated to GitHub > > https://github.com/artyom-beilis/cppcms > > Please note: > > 1. Only CppCMS framework migrated, other subprojects like CppDB or > Wikipp are still pending conversion > 2. The main bug tracker is still on source-forge - however I'll relate > to issues opened on GitHub > > Regards, > Artyom Beilis > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > ------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > Cppcms-users mailing list > Cpp...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cppcms-users > |