Thread: [Cppcms-users] App configuration section : namespace question
Brought to you by:
artyom-beilis
Menu
▾
▴
cppcms-users
|
From: augustin <aug...@ov...> - 2012-07-02 09:14:14
|
About this feature request: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1011838&aid=3539381&group_id=209965 I tried to log into sourceforge to comment there, but whenever I try to, I get a blank page with the simple message: "XSRF Attempt Detected!" I can't login so I comment here. If I understand the question correctly, I think it is about namespace collision. The user wants to make sure there will be no namespace collision now and in the future between cppcms settings and his application's settings. cppcms settings probably should have been placed in a single namespace like this: "cppcms" : { "localization" { "locales" : [ "en_US.UTF-8" ] } } etc. augustin. -- Friends: http://www.reuniting.info/ My projects: http://astralcity.org/ http://lesenjeux.fr/ http://linux.overshoot.tv/ http://overshoot.tv/ http://charityware.info/ http://masquilier.org/ http://openteacher.info/ http://minguo.info/ http://jacqueslemaire.fr/ http://www.wechange.org/ http://searching911.info/ . |
|
From: Lee E. <lee...@gm...> - 2012-07-02 10:28:59
|
This is the other way around for solving the issue - but yes this is exactly the issue i think that moving all the CppCMS configurations into a namespace will render all existing config files non working - so i prefered the other way around. some guarantee that cppcms will not use the name: "app_config" for example with that guarantee i can build config files that i am certain will never conflict and as i said - an easi API to get to those settings will be a nice plus On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 12:13 PM, augustin <aug...@ov...>wrote: > About this feature request: > > http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1011838&aid=3539381&group_id=209965 > > I tried to log into sourceforge to comment there, but whenever I try to, I > get > a blank page with the simple message: "XSRF Attempt Detected!" > > I can't login so I comment here. > > If I understand the question correctly, I think it is about namespace > collision. > The user wants to make sure there will be no namespace collision now and in > the future between cppcms settings and his application's settings. > cppcms settings probably should have been placed in a single namespace like > this: > > "cppcms" : { > "localization" { > "locales" : [ "en_US.UTF-8" ] > } > } > etc. > > augustin. > > > > > -- > Friends: http://www.reuniting.info/ > My projects: > http://astralcity.org/ http://lesenjeux.fr/ http://linux.overshoot.tv/ > http://overshoot.tv/ http://charityware.info/ http://masquilier.org/ > http://openteacher.info/ http://minguo.info/ http://jacqueslemaire.fr/ > http://www.wechange.org/ http://searching911.info/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > . > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Live Security Virtual Conference > Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and > threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions > will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware > threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ > _______________________________________________ > Cppcms-users mailing list > Cpp...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cppcms-users > -- -- lee Lee Elenbaas lee...@gm... |
|
From: Artyom B. <art...@ya...> - 2012-07-02 10:42:00
|
Generally I put my cppcms apps settings in their own namespace i.e. blog, wikipp, mb (message board) But I can add a guarantee that there will be no members used by CppCMS that start with one of the following prefixes: - app - data - conf - Any Capital letter (.i.e. MyApp) - Underscore "_" So any name in format "(app|data|conf|[A-Z_]).*" will be reserved for application use. Is it Ok? If so who adds this there: http://cppcms.com/wikipp/en/page/cppcms_1x_config Artyom Beilis -------------- CppCMS - C++ Web Framework: http://cppcms.com/ CppDB - C++ SQL Connectivity: http://cppcms.com/sql/cppdb/ >________________________________ > From: Lee Elenbaas <lee...@gm...> >To: cpp...@li... >Sent: Monday, July 2, 2012 1:28 PM >Subject: Re: [Cppcms-users] App configuration section : namespace question > > >This is the other way around for solving the issue - but yes this is exactly the issue >i think that moving all the CppCMS configurations into a namespace will render all existing config files non working - so i prefered the other way around. > > >some guarantee that cppcms will not use the name: "app_config" for example >with that guarantee i can build config files that i am certain will never conflict > > >and as i said - an easi API to get to those settings will be a nice plus > > >On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 12:13 PM, augustin <aug...@ov...> wrote: > >About this feature request: >>http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1011838&aid=3539381&group_id=209965 >> >>I tried to log into sourceforge to comment there, but whenever I try to, I get >>a blank page with the simple message: "XSRF Attempt Detected!" >> >>I can't login so I comment here. >> >>If I understand the question correctly, I think it is about namespace >>collision. >>The user wants to make sure there will be no namespace collision now and in >>the future between cppcms settings and his application's settings. >>cppcms settings probably should have been placed in a single namespace like >>this: >> >>"cppcms" : { >> "localization" { >> "locales" : [ "en_US.UTF-8" ] >> } >> } >>etc. >> >>augustin. >> >> >> >> >>-- >>Friends: http://www.reuniting.info/ >>My projects: >>http://astralcity.org/ http://lesenjeux.fr/ http://linux.overshoot.tv/ >>http://overshoot.tv/ http://charityware.info/ http://masquilier.org/ >>http://openteacher.info/ http://minguo.info/ http://jacqueslemaire.fr/ >>http://www.wechange.org/ http://searching911.info/ >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>. >> >>------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>Live Security Virtual Conference >>Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and >>threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions >>will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware >>threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ >>_______________________________________________ >>Cppcms-users mailing list >>Cpp...@li... >>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cppcms-users >> > > > >-- >-- >lee >Lee Elenbaas >lee...@gm... > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >Live Security Virtual Conference >Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and >threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions >will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware >threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ >_______________________________________________ >Cppcms-users mailing list >Cpp...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cppcms-users > > > |
|
From: Lee E. <lee...@gm...> - 2012-07-02 11:28:58
|
done - thanks On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Artyom Beilis <art...@ya...> wrote: > Generally I put my cppcms apps settings in their own namespace i.e. blog, > wikipp, mb (message board) > > But I can add a guarantee that there will be no members used by CppCMS > that start with one of the following prefixes: > > - app > - data > - conf > - Any Capital letter (.i.e. MyApp) > - Underscore "_" > > So any name in format "(app|data|conf|[A-Z_]).*" will be reserved for > application use. > > Is it Ok? > > If so who adds this there: > http://cppcms.com/wikipp/en/page/cppcms_1x_config > > > Artyom Beilis > -------------- > CppCMS - C++ Web Framework: http://cppcms.com/ > CppDB - C++ SQL Connectivity: http://cppcms.com/sql/cppdb/ > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Lee Elenbaas <lee...@gm...> > *To:* cpp...@li... > *Sent:* Monday, July 2, 2012 1:28 PM > *Subject:* Re: [Cppcms-users] App configuration section : namespace > question > > This is the other way around for solving the issue - but yes this is > exactly the issue > i think that moving all the CppCMS configurations into a namespace will > render all existing config files non working - so i prefered the other way > around. > > some guarantee that cppcms will not use the name: "app_config" for example > with that guarantee i can build config files that i am certain will never > conflict > > and as i said - an easi API to get to those settings will be a nice plus > > On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 12:13 PM, augustin <aug...@ov...>wrote: > > About this feature request: > > http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1011838&aid=3539381&group_id=209965 > > I tried to log into sourceforge to comment there, but whenever I try to, I > get > a blank page with the simple message: "XSRF Attempt Detected!" > > I can't login so I comment here. > > If I understand the question correctly, I think it is about namespace > collision. > The user wants to make sure there will be no namespace collision now and in > the future between cppcms settings and his application's settings. > cppcms settings probably should have been placed in a single namespace like > this: > > "cppcms" : { > "localization" { > "locales" : [ "en_US.UTF-8" ] > } > } > etc. > > augustin. > > > > > -- > Friends: http://www.reuniting.info/ > My projects: > http://astralcity.org/ http://lesenjeux.fr/ http://linux.overshoot.tv/ > http://overshoot.tv/ http://charityware.info/ http://masquilier.org/ > http://openteacher.info/ http://minguo.info/ http://jacqueslemaire.fr/ > http://www.wechange.org/ http://searching911.info/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > . > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Live Security Virtual Conference > Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and > threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions > will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware > threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ > _______________________________________________ > Cppcms-users mailing list > Cpp...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cppcms-users > > > > > -- > -- > lee > Lee Elenbaas > lee...@gm... > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Live Security Virtual Conference > Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and > threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions > will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware > threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ > _______________________________________________ > Cppcms-users mailing list > Cpp...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cppcms-users > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Live Security Virtual Conference > Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and > threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions > will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware > threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ > _______________________________________________ > Cppcms-users mailing list > Cpp...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cppcms-users > > -- -- lee Lee Elenbaas lee...@gm... |
×
Want the latest updates on software, tech news, and AI?
Get latest updates about software, tech news, and AI from SourceForge directly in your inbox once a month.
Thanks for helping keep SourceForge clean.
X