Thread: [Cppcms-users] CppCMS 1.0.0 - Stable is ready - it is Dual Licensed under LGPL and Commercial Licen

Brought to you by: artyom-beilis

cppcms-users

[Cppcms-users] CppCMS 1.0.0 - Stable is ready - it is Dual Licensed under LGPL and Commercial License

From: Artyom B. <art...@ya...> - 2012-02-26 23:20:23

Congratulations!!!


CppCMS 1.0.0 Stable is ready.

Additionally to providing a stable release, CppCMS is available

now under an alternative Commercial License.

See: http://commercial.cppcms.com

Artyom Beilis

Re: [Cppcms-users] CppCMS 1.0.0 - Stable is ready - it is Dual Licensed under LGPL and Commercial License

From: Leon <le...@wl...> - 2012-02-28 02:24:57

Congratulations!

Wish a success for your product.

On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 7:20 AM, Artyom Beilis <art...@ya...> wrote:
> Congratulations!!!
>
>
> CppCMS 1.0.0 Stable is ready.
>
> Additionally to providing a stable release, CppCMS is available
>
> now under an alternative Commercial License.
>
> See: http://commercial.cppcms.com
>
> Artyom Beilis
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Virtualization & Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning
> Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing
> also focuses on allowing computing to be delivered as a service.
> http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51521223/
> _______________________________________________
> Cppcms-users mailing list
> Cpp...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cppcms-users

Re: [Cppcms-users] CppCMS 1.0.0 - Stable is ready - it is Dual Licensed under LGPL and Commercial License

From: william l. <we...@gm...> - 2012-02-28 05:51:54

Congratulations !

CppCMS is really nice and best server side C++ framework!

On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Leon <le...@wl...> wrote:

> Congratulations!
>
> Wish a success for your product.
>
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 7:20 AM, Artyom Beilis <art...@ya...>
> wrote:
> > Congratulations!!!
> >
> >
> > CppCMS 1.0.0 Stable is ready.
> >
> > Additionally to providing a stable release, CppCMS is available
> >
> > now under an alternative Commercial License.
> >
> > See: http://commercial.cppcms.com
> >
> > Artyom Beilis
> >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Virtualization & Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning
> > Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing
> > also focuses on allowing computing to be delivered as a service.
> > http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51521223/
> > _______________________________________________
> > Cppcms-users mailing list
> > Cpp...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cppcms-users
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow!
> The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers
> is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3,
> Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now!
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d
> _______________________________________________
> Cppcms-users mailing list
> Cpp...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cppcms-users
>

Re: [Cppcms-users] CppCMS 1.0.0 - Stable is ready - it is Dual Licensed under LGPL and Commercial License

From: Klaim - J. L. <mj...@gm...> - 2012-02-28 13:01:00

Congratulations as well!

I just need a short confirmation/clarification:
LGPL here means that we can use CPPCMS as we want as far as we don't touch
it's code,
we use the separate .so version and we have our own application code in
separate binary.

Am I correct?

Joël Lamotte

Re: [Cppcms-users] CppCMS 1.0.0 - Stable is ready - it is Dual Licensed under LGPL and Commercial License

From: Artyom B. <art...@ya...> - 2012-02-28 13:22:19

> 
>
>Congratulations as well!
>
>I just need a short confirmation/clarification: 
>LGPL here means that we can use CPPCMS as we want as far as we don't touch it's code, 
>we use the separate .so version and we have our own application code in separate binary.
>
>Am I correct? 
>
>
>Joël Lamotte
>

Disclaimer

----------

First of all I'm not a lawyer everything I say is not a substitute
in the LGPL license agreement. If there is a contradiction between
the license agreement and what I write down, the LGPL License
agreement defines the terms
------------

It is not only the conditions...

You have to allow user to change the library and fix
bugs. So if you have some embedded devices you should provide
an appropriate access to update the shared object.


For these purposes user may for example reverse engineer your 

application in order to understand how to do such modifications,
and you may not forbid it.

(Section 4 of LGPLv3)


Also you must be able to provide sources of the CppCMS upon
the clients request and ship the LGPL license agreement with
your software, so the user could know that he uses free
software.


In any case if you are not sure I'd recommend your to
refer to:

  http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html


Or ask your lawyer.

Of course if you are not sure that you may to or want
to comply with the LGPLv3 license terms you may purchase

the commercial license for your product.


Artyom Beilis.

Re: [Cppcms-users] CppCMS 1.0.0 - Stable is ready - it is Dual Licensed under LGPL and Commercial License

From: Klaim - J. L. <mj...@gm...> - 2012-02-28 14:30:02

On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 14:22, Artyom Beilis <art...@ya...> wrote:

> In any case if you are not sure I'd recommend your to
> refer to:
>
>   http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html
>
>
> Or ask your lawyer.
>
> Of course if you are not sure that you may to or want
> to comply with the LGPLv3 license terms you may purchase
>
> the commercial license for your product.
>
>

Well for the moment I'll not use CPPCMS for commercial purpose yet (i need
to "'play" with it to get used to it for bigger projects) so I guess it's
not good for me to get a commercial license now.
But I'll contact you once I get to commercial projects, sure.

Joël Lamotte