cppcms-users

[Daniel V. <chi...@gm...>]

Hello Artyom

I think that boost::variant type fits exactly as base class for
cppcms::json::value.

I think that one pro of this approach is that boost::variant interface
is more familiar and has good visitor interface.

You think about that?

This break your ABI requirerements?

Another question. You define json::object as std::map, which it has
O(log n) complexity for access

Why you don't use boost::unordered_map which it has O(n) complexity?

Thank you!