cppcms-users — Disussions of users of CppCMS

Re: [Cppcms-users] About raw filter translation.

[redred77 <red...@gm...>]

I think you over trusted compiler's inline function.
They do their best, but they can't skip making temporary objects.


1. So, I benchmarked.
Printed 1000000 times for each and measured with
Windows QueryPerformanceCounter().
Of course compiled for Release build. (Full Optimization)

out() << "/testtext";
out() << cppcms::filters::raw("/testtext");

Result :
0.109707 sec
0.120335 sec

So filters::raw() is actually slower about 9%.



2. You'll be surprised when you see the disassembly.

out() << "/testtext";

00FDC828  mov         ecx,ebx
00FDC82A  call        edi
00FDC82C  mov         edx,1026F50h
00FDC831  mov         ecx,eax
00FDC833  call        std::operator<<<std::char_traits<char> > (0FD1A30h)



out() << cppcms::filters::raw("/testtext");

00FDC838  push        1026F50h
00FDC83D  lea         ecx,[esp+50h]
00FDC841  call        dword ptr ds:[10131D8h]
00FDC847  lea         eax,[esp+4Ch]
00FDC84B  mov         dword ptr [esp+0D0h],2
00FDC856  push        eax
00FDC857  lea         ecx,[esp+2Ch]
00FDC85B  call        dword ptr ds:[10131CCh]
00FDC861  mov         esi,eax
00FDC863  mov         ecx,ebx
00FDC865  mov         byte ptr [esp+0D0h],3
00FDC86D  call        edi
00FDC86F  push        eax
00FDC870  mov         ecx,esi
00FDC872  call        dword ptr ds:[10131D4h]
00FDC878  lea         ecx,[esp+28h]
00FDC87C  mov         byte ptr [esp+0D0h],2
00FDC884  call        dword ptr ds:[10131D0h]
00FDC88A  lea         ecx,[esp+4Ch]
00FDC88E  mov         dword ptr [esp+0D0h],0FFFFFFFFh
00FDC899  call        dword ptr ds:[10131E0h]


There's so many call instructions that are actually not necessary at all.
It's because wrapping with filters::raw is not just call and return but it
makes and destroy temporary streamable object each time.

Here are brief call order. You can also follow this codes one by one with
your debugger.

streamable::streamable(char const *ptr)
streamable::streamable(streamable const &other)
raw::raw(streamable const &obj) : obj_(obj) {}
inline std::ostream &operator<<(std::ostream &out,raw const &obj)
void raw::operator()(std::ostream &out) const
void streamable::operator()(std::ostream &out) const
void ch_to_stream(std::ostream &out,void const *p)



3. What I like and decided to move to CppCMS the most is that it takes
performance seriously.
Maybe I'm too concerned about performance, but this is what I learned from
the server running currently. It crashed down so many times when visitors
explode.


Thanks.



2015-07-05 5:06 GMT+09:00 Joerg Sonnenberger <jo...@br...>:

> On Sun, Jul 05, 2015 at 02:09:16AM +0900, redred77 wrote:
> > It seems like raw filter in view template does nothing but just wraps
> input
> > variable.
> > So below two lines are just same.
> >
> > out()<<cppcms::filters::raw(content.hello);
> > out()<<content.hello;
> >
> > First one looks more structured which seems like to follow rules like
> other
> > filters.
> > But isn't it better for cppcms_tmpl_cc.py to translate like the second
> one
> > in a performance aspect view?
>
> It's inlined.
>
> Joerg
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Don't Limit Your Business. Reach for the Cloud.
> GigeNET's Cloud Solutions provide you with the tools and support that
> you need to offload your IT needs and focus on growing your business.
> Configured For All Businesses. Start Your Cloud Today.
> https://www.gigenetcloud.com/
> _______________________________________________
> Cppcms-users mailing list
> Cpp...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cppcms-users
>

Re: [Cppcms-users] About raw filter translation.

[Joerg S. <jo...@br...>]

On Sun, Jul 05, 2015 at 02:09:16AM +0900, redred77 wrote:
> It seems like raw filter in view template does nothing but just wraps input
> variable.
> So below two lines are just same.
> 
> out()<<cppcms::filters::raw(content.hello);
> out()<<content.hello;
> 
> First one looks more structured which seems like to follow rules like other
> filters.
> But isn't it better for cppcms_tmpl_cc.py to translate like the second one
> in a performance aspect view?

It's inlined.

Joerg

[Cppcms-users] About raw filter translation.

[redred77 <red...@gm...>]

Hi

It seems like raw filter in view template does nothing but just wraps input
variable.
So below two lines are just same.

out()<<cppcms::filters::raw(content.hello);
out()<<content.hello;

First one looks more structured which seems like to follow rules like other
filters.
But isn't it better for cppcms_tmpl_cc.py to translate like the second one
in a performance aspect view?

I know CppCMS is fast enough but don't want to waste CPU cycle for these
reasons.

1. This logic is not necessary at all.
2. Translated result cpp is not intended to view or edit for human. It can
be optimized more.
3. I use raw filter far many times. More than escape filter.
4. Maybe I'm too obsessed with performance

I think I can edit the cppcms_tmpl_cc.py code to change behaviour and send
patch but want to listen thoughts about it.


Thanks.

[Cppcms-users] Is simple http module included in CppCMS?

[redred77 <red...@gm...>]

Maybe it's just silly question.

My current PHP website runs elasticsearch for search backend.
I'm trying to migrate whole site to CppCMS and need CURL like things to
connect to elasticsearch from web service. Just simple HTTP request with
POST is enough.

I can add CURL or Cpp-netlib libraries, or maybe use booster::asio but
became curious that if CppCMS already have that kind of http request util
inside.


Thanks.

Re: [Cppcms-users] State of the Union

[redred77 <red...@gm...>]

Hi

>>How is years old mail list thread different from years old github
issue? Could you provide some details? I just don't see the
difference. (+ you found the thread, so it's likely that anyone
searching for solution would find your answer).

-> I can add comments just below the asking post if it's on github. But
can't do that on mailing list. Next google searcher can't see my answer
then. You would say my new answer post will be shown at other google search
result but that's really messy isn't it? Can't link new post from previous
post.

>> post your
partial research and ask others to help you with it

-> Maybe it's only me, but I usually think I have to post rather refined,
valuable things to mailing list to not bother reader than forums.
It's out of topic but I read every mailing list of cppcms since I
subscribed. Well I don't do that with other projects but I do with cppcms.
Maybe I might think cppcms more holy things.

Whatever github or sourceforge, I like this project. Have a nice day.
Sorry dude,
but I think you are wrong. Don't take it the wrong way, I'm all for
github, but for me it's just the code and the git, I just hate svn.
Mailing list fulfill they role. Let's take your example from the start
of your email.

How is years old mail list thread different from years old github
issue? Could you provide some details? I just don't see the
difference. (+ you found the thread, so it's likely that anyone
searching for solution would find your answer).

> I can't write not-completed, not-fully-researched info to discuss with
everyone.

This in general is not true. I don't know about this particular thread
(I signed up today), but other list I'm in it's normal to post your
partial research and ask others to help you with it. They in most
cases do.

just my two cents..

On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 8:21 PM, redred77 <red...@gm...> wrote:
> Sorry that my email disappointed you.
> What I meant I can contribute is not about the bug actually. I wrote it on
> mobile and didn't write it long. Sorry for that.
> I mean I can contribute to help people as a community member for who stuck
> with same problem I suffered. I like github because of 1) "fluent
community
> system" and 2) "big user base".
>
> It's not about the source. I would like to have some Q&A like system only
> for CppCMS. Well github doesn't provide Q&A system but actually github's
> issue system is quite good for it too. (See how people are using github's
> issue page)
>
> CppCMS's knowledge base is kept on mailing list and Wiki mostly, and it's
> quite hard to find some answers for beginners or some particular problems.
> Maybe it's related problem between "mailing-list vs bbs".
>
>
> Here's one example. Assume that I suffered compiling cppcms/cppdb on
> Windows. I read all info from Wiki about it but couldn't solve it. I
> searched for the issue on Google and found same issue asking post from
past
> cppcms mailing list. There isn't helpful reply to solve, or it's
out-dated.
> When I found the answer on my own, do you think I have to reply to that
> mailing-list? No. It's just spam because it's few years old. So, my
> knowledge will be gone away and will not piled up to open source community
> forever.
> If it was github issue, I can add some more detailed info and comments for
> next searcher.
>
>
> Let me show what I suffered. I ran cppcms for development on Windows and
> found that Visual Studio doesn't compile utf-8 string as raw. So, when
view
> template cpp has plain foreign language, it compiles well but shows wrong
> characters. I didn't know how VS handle utf-8 string, I just thought it
> saves string what the cpp file is saved as. (same like utf-8)
>
> I had to add below lines to force compile it as raw utf-8.
>
> #ifdef _MSC_VER
> __pragma (execution_character_set("utf-8"))
> #endif
>
>
> You would may ask that why I didn't send patch for it.
> Well, here are reasons what I thought.
>
> 1) I don't think it's best answer for this situation.
>     Visual Studio changes a lot between versions. VS2008, VS2010, VS2013
> supports this #pragma but VS2012 doesn't. Very weird.
>     Not sure future version would support this pragma. This #pragma is
very
> incomplete, temporary solution I think
> 2) cppcms recommends to use gettext() to print foreign languages.
gettext()
> would not have any problems I suffered.
>     I think I'm the only one stuck this problem.
> 3) cppcms mainly targets linux, but I haven't tested this situation on
linux
> yet. I can't send patch even I haven't tested. Some other things would be
> broken by this lines.
> 4) New gcc have raw format saving feature like "u8R". I think it's better
> solution but not all compilers supports it yet.
> 5) And, I'm not sure it's bug, rather specific platform's compatibility
> issue.
>     Cppcms dev already knows that compiling on windows is straightforward.
>     For example, you have to resave some files to UTF8+BOM to compile with
> VS nmake.
> 6) I haven't edited cppcms_tmpl_cc.py to make it compatible.
>     I mean I don't have the edited source code. As you know, view template
> must be translated by this python script.
>     I just have found the answer by editing the result cpp file by myself.
>     I have no code to send actually yet.
>
> Well, these are the problems why I hesitated. Yeah, "it's not completed
> research".
>
> Maybe I could have open a issue about it on github to discuss, but I was
> afraid about it on sending to mailing-list.
> Do you understand? Many people open issue on github with this kind of
> problem & info but mailing-list has much higher hurdle because everybody
> will read it. I can't write not-completed, not-fully-researched info to
> discuss with everyone.
>
> Also, FAQ or Wiki cannot handle all practical issues like this. Then it
will
> be too long.
>
>
> To say it in clearly, I like bbs or forum than mailing-list.
> Github provides bbs, community system and Sourceforge is good at
> mailing-list I think.
>
> I like cppcms, and want to see it grow. Don't think I'm against this
> project, I really love this well structured codes.
>
>
> 2015. 6. 30. 오전 12:07에 "Joerg Sonnenberger" <jo...@br...>님이
작성:
>
>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:42:15PM +0900, redred77 wrote:
>> > I have started new project with cppcms few weeks ago, and I found
>> > several
>> > points I can contribute but couldn't do it. Moving to github would give
>> > much more contributors like me.
>>
>> I call this bullshit. You can send patches, you can create bug reports.
>> Nothing stops you from contributing. It might surprise people, but Open
>> Source projects have existed before github or even SF. The methods to
>> contribute haven't changed that much...
>>
>> Joerg
>>
>>
>>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Monitor 25 network devices or servers for free with OpManager!
>> OpManager is web-based network management software that monitors
>> network devices and physical & virtual servers, alerts via email & sms
>> for fault. Monitor 25 devices for free with no restriction. Download now
>> http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/292181274;119417398;o
>> _______________________________________________
>> Cppcms-users mailing list
>> Cpp...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cppcms-users
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Don't Limit Your Business. Reach for the Cloud.
> GigeNET's Cloud Solutions provide you with the tools and support that
> you need to offload your IT needs and focus on growing your business.
> Configured For All Businesses. Start Your Cloud Today.
> https://www.gigenetcloud.com/
> _______________________________________________
> Cppcms-users mailing list
> Cpp...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cppcms-users
>



--
Tomas P4l4cl][n Volf
-- "There are only 10 types of people in the world: Those who
understand binary, and those who don't."

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't Limit Your Business. Reach for the Cloud.
GigeNET's Cloud Solutions provide you with the tools and support that
you need to offload your IT needs and focus on growing your business.
Configured For All Businesses. Start Your Cloud Today.
https://www.gigenetcloud.com/
_______________________________________________
Cppcms-users mailing list
Cpp...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cppcms-users

Re: [Cppcms-users] State of the Union

[Artyom B. <art...@ya...>]

>________________________________
> From: Tomáš Volf <vol...@gm...>
>To: Cpp...@li... 
>Sent: Monday, June 29, 2015 4:01 PM
>Subject: [Cppcms-users] State of the Union
> 
>
>Greetings all,
>I'm new here, so I will speak a bit. I was so far interested in Wt,
>since I have Qt background and it was quite familiar. But it's getting
>more and more annoying. So I looked around and found CppCMS. Which
>honestly looks good. I would like to ask just three questions:
>
>1) How does CppCMS compare to Wt in matter of performance for high
>number of concurrent users? Concrete deployment would be FastCGI
>behind nginx if that's relevant.

>

Wt was never build with performance in mind. Stuff like caching,
and scaling is integrated part of the CppCMS that were from the
beginning there.

Look at this: http://blog.cppcms.com/post/114

Another thing is the philosophy of the design. I started CppCMS
when Wt was around as its concept of "GUI" design is wrong IMHO.

You want interactive and efficient GUI - use client side javascript
technology and combine it with solid backed - making it "integrated"
is just wrong.
>2) How is development of CppCMS looking? Last commit seems to be over
>two months old (20th of april). Is this project still active in any
>meaningful way?

>

Yes it is
>3) Was moving project from sourceforge and svn to let's say github and
>git ever considered?


You got the correct answer by other list members.

I got some great contributions using patches - so I don't buy "github"
makes it easier - what makes it easier is actually developing stuff
and so far I don't see much besides talking.

Moving to git would break many existing tools. Also svn works great
for branching merging and other things and it suits this project very well.
>Thanks for answers,
>Tomas Volf
>





Artyom Beilis 
-------------- 
CppCMS - C++ Web Framework:   http://cppcms.com/ 
CppDB - C++ SQL Connectivity: http://cppcms.com/sql/cppdb/

Re: [Cppcms-users] Commercial license

[Artyom B. <art...@ya...>]

The answer is simple - the license is per-developer license per year. If there was no 3.1 nothing would prevent you from doing development with LGPL version and than buy a one license for distribution. Similar restriction exists in Qt license.
So it is either LGPL or commercial - you can always switch to LGPL but not the other way around.
If you still have problems with 3.1 contact me directly. Artyom Beilis
--------------
CppCMS - C++ Web Framework:   http://cppcms.com/
CppDB - C++ SQL Connectivity: http://cppcms.com/sql/cppdb/
 
      From: Tomáš Volf <vol...@gm...>
 To: Cpp...@li... 
 Sent: Monday, June 29, 2015 4:50 PM
 Subject: [Cppcms-users] Commercial license
   
Greetings,
I have another question regarding commercial license, specifically
point 3.1. What was the reasoning behind it? I think I never saw
anything like that. Because it forbids you from making short proof of
concept in few frameworks (e.g. CppCMS and Wt) and that selecting the
best one and buying the license for that. Which seems... weird.

I curious about reason for this.

Have a nice day,
Tomas Volf

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Monitor 25 network devices or servers for free with OpManager!
OpManager is web-based network management software that monitors 
network devices and physical & virtual servers, alerts via email & sms 
for fault. Monitor 25 devices for free with no restriction. Download now
http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/292181274;119417398;o
_______________________________________________
Cppcms-users mailing list
Cpp...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cppcms-users


   

Re: [Cppcms-users] State of the Union

[Tomáš V. <vol...@gm...>]

Sorry dude,
but I think you are wrong. Don't take it the wrong way, I'm all for
github, but for me it's just the code and the git, I just hate svn.
Mailing list fulfill they role. Let's take your example from the start
of your email.

How is years old mail list thread different from years old github
issue? Could you provide some details? I just don't see the
difference. (+ you found the thread, so it's likely that anyone
searching for solution would find your answer).

> I can't write not-completed, not-fully-researched info to discuss with everyone.

This in general is not true. I don't know about this particular thread
(I signed up today), but other list I'm in it's normal to post your
partial research and ask others to help you with it. They in most
cases do.

just my two cents..

On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 8:21 PM, redred77 <red...@gm...> wrote:
> Sorry that my email disappointed you.
> What I meant I can contribute is not about the bug actually. I wrote it on
> mobile and didn't write it long. Sorry for that.
> I mean I can contribute to help people as a community member for who stuck
> with same problem I suffered. I like github because of 1) "fluent community
> system" and 2) "big user base".
>
> It's not about the source. I would like to have some Q&A like system only
> for CppCMS. Well github doesn't provide Q&A system but actually github's
> issue system is quite good for it too. (See how people are using github's
> issue page)
>
> CppCMS's knowledge base is kept on mailing list and Wiki mostly, and it's
> quite hard to find some answers for beginners or some particular problems.
> Maybe it's related problem between "mailing-list vs bbs".
>
>
> Here's one example. Assume that I suffered compiling cppcms/cppdb on
> Windows. I read all info from Wiki about it but couldn't solve it. I
> searched for the issue on Google and found same issue asking post from past
> cppcms mailing list. There isn't helpful reply to solve, or it's out-dated.
> When I found the answer on my own, do you think I have to reply to that
> mailing-list? No. It's just spam because it's few years old. So, my
> knowledge will be gone away and will not piled up to open source community
> forever.
> If it was github issue, I can add some more detailed info and comments for
> next searcher.
>
>
> Let me show what I suffered. I ran cppcms for development on Windows and
> found that Visual Studio doesn't compile utf-8 string as raw. So, when view
> template cpp has plain foreign language, it compiles well but shows wrong
> characters. I didn't know how VS handle utf-8 string, I just thought it
> saves string what the cpp file is saved as. (same like utf-8)
>
> I had to add below lines to force compile it as raw utf-8.
>
> #ifdef _MSC_VER
> __pragma (execution_character_set("utf-8"))
> #endif
>
>
> You would may ask that why I didn't send patch for it.
> Well, here are reasons what I thought.
>
> 1) I don't think it's best answer for this situation.
>     Visual Studio changes a lot between versions. VS2008, VS2010, VS2013
> supports this #pragma but VS2012 doesn't. Very weird.
>     Not sure future version would support this pragma. This #pragma is very
> incomplete, temporary solution I think
> 2) cppcms recommends to use gettext() to print foreign languages. gettext()
> would not have any problems I suffered.
>     I think I'm the only one stuck this problem.
> 3) cppcms mainly targets linux, but I haven't tested this situation on linux
> yet. I can't send patch even I haven't tested. Some other things would be
> broken by this lines.
> 4) New gcc have raw format saving feature like "u8R". I think it's better
> solution but not all compilers supports it yet.
> 5) And, I'm not sure it's bug, rather specific platform's compatibility
> issue.
>     Cppcms dev already knows that compiling on windows is straightforward.
>     For example, you have to resave some files to UTF8+BOM to compile with
> VS nmake.
> 6) I haven't edited cppcms_tmpl_cc.py to make it compatible.
>     I mean I don't have the edited source code. As you know, view template
> must be translated by this python script.
>     I just have found the answer by editing the result cpp file by myself.
>     I have no code to send actually yet.
>
> Well, these are the problems why I hesitated. Yeah, "it's not completed
> research".
>
> Maybe I could have open a issue about it on github to discuss, but I was
> afraid about it on sending to mailing-list.
> Do you understand? Many people open issue on github with this kind of
> problem & info but mailing-list has much higher hurdle because everybody
> will read it. I can't write not-completed, not-fully-researched info to
> discuss with everyone.
>
> Also, FAQ or Wiki cannot handle all practical issues like this. Then it will
> be too long.
>
>
> To say it in clearly, I like bbs or forum than mailing-list.
> Github provides bbs, community system and Sourceforge is good at
> mailing-list I think.
>
> I like cppcms, and want to see it grow. Don't think I'm against this
> project, I really love this well structured codes.
>
>
> 2015. 6. 30. 오전 12:07에 "Joerg Sonnenberger" <jo...@br...>님이 작성:
>
>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:42:15PM +0900, redred77 wrote:
>> > I have started new project with cppcms few weeks ago, and I found
>> > several
>> > points I can contribute but couldn't do it. Moving to github would give
>> > much more contributors like me.
>>
>> I call this bullshit. You can send patches, you can create bug reports.
>> Nothing stops you from contributing. It might surprise people, but Open
>> Source projects have existed before github or even SF. The methods to
>> contribute haven't changed that much...
>>
>> Joerg
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Monitor 25 network devices or servers for free with OpManager!
>> OpManager is web-based network management software that monitors
>> network devices and physical & virtual servers, alerts via email & sms
>> for fault. Monitor 25 devices for free with no restriction. Download now
>> http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/292181274;119417398;o
>> _______________________________________________
>> Cppcms-users mailing list
>> Cpp...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cppcms-users
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Don't Limit Your Business. Reach for the Cloud.
> GigeNET's Cloud Solutions provide you with the tools and support that
> you need to offload your IT needs and focus on growing your business.
> Configured For All Businesses. Start Your Cloud Today.
> https://www.gigenetcloud.com/
> _______________________________________________
> Cppcms-users mailing list
> Cpp...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cppcms-users
>



-- 
Tomas P4l4cl][n Volf
-- "There are only 10 types of people in the world: Those who
understand binary, and those who don't."

Re: [Cppcms-users] State of the Union

[redred77 <red...@gm...>]

Sorry that my email disappointed you.
What I meant I can contribute is not about the bug actually. I wrote it on
mobile and didn't write it long. Sorry for that.
I mean I can contribute to help people as a community member for who stuck
with same problem I suffered. I like github because of 1) "fluent community
system" and 2) "big user base".

It's not about the source. I would like to have some Q&A like system only
for CppCMS. Well github doesn't provide Q&A system but actually github's
issue system is quite good for it too. (See how people are using github's
issue page)

CppCMS's knowledge base is kept on mailing list and Wiki mostly, and it's
quite hard to find some answers for beginners or some particular problems.
Maybe it's related problem between "mailing-list vs bbs".


Here's one example. Assume that I suffered compiling cppcms/cppdb on
Windows. I read all info from Wiki about it but couldn't solve it. I
searched for the issue on Google and found same issue asking post from past
cppcms mailing list. There isn't helpful reply to solve, or it's out-dated.
When I found the answer on my own, do you think I have to reply to that
mailing-list? No. It's just spam because it's few years old. So, my
knowledge will be gone away and will not piled up to open source community
forever.
If it was github issue, I can add some more detailed info and comments for
next searcher.

Let me show what I suffered. I ran cppcms for development on Windows and
found that Visual Studio doesn't compile utf-8 string as raw. So, when view
template cpp has plain foreign language, it compiles well but shows wrong
characters. I didn't know how VS handle utf-8 string, I just thought it
saves string what the cpp file is saved as. (same like utf-8)

I had to add below lines to force compile it as raw utf-8.

#ifdef _MSC_VER
__pragma (execution_character_set("utf-8"))
#endif


You would may ask that why I didn't send patch for it.
Well, here are reasons what I thought.

1) I don't think it's best answer for this situation.
    Visual Studio changes a lot between versions. VS2008, VS2010, VS2013
supports this #pragma but VS2012 doesn't. Very weird.
    Not sure future version would support this pragma. This #pragma is very
incomplete, temporary solution I think
2) cppcms recommends to use gettext() to print foreign languages. gettext()
would not have any problems I suffered.
    I think I'm the only one stuck this problem.
3) cppcms mainly targets linux, but I haven't tested this situation on
linux yet. I can't send patch even I haven't tested. Some other things
would be broken by this lines.
4) New gcc have raw format saving feature like "u8R". I think it's better
solution but not all compilers supports it yet.
5) And, I'm not sure it's bug, rather specific platform's compatibility
issue.
    Cppcms dev already knows that compiling on windows is straightforward.
    For example, you have to resave some files to UTF8+BOM to compile with
VS nmake.
6) I haven't edited cppcms_tmpl_cc.py to make it compatible.
    I mean I don't have the edited source code. As you know, view template
must be translated by this python script.
    I just have found the answer by editing the result cpp file by myself.
    I have no code to send actually yet.

Well, these are the problems why I hesitated. Yeah, "it's not completed
research".

Maybe I could have open a issue about it on github to discuss, but I was
afraid about it on sending to mailing-list.
Do you understand? Many people open issue on github with this kind of
problem & info but mailing-list has much higher hurdle because everybody
will read it. I can't write not-completed, not-fully-researched info to
discuss with everyone.

Also, FAQ or Wiki cannot handle all practical issues like this. Then it
will be too long.


To say it in clearly, I like bbs or forum than mailing-list.
Github provides bbs, community system and Sourceforge is good at
mailing-list I think.

I like cppcms, and want to see it grow. Don't think I'm against this
project, I really love this well structured codes.


2015. 6. 30. 오전 12:07에 "Joerg Sonnenberger" <jo...@br...>님이 작성:

> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:42:15PM +0900, redred77 wrote:
> > I have started new project with cppcms few weeks ago, and I found several
> > points I can contribute but couldn't do it. Moving to github would give
> > much more contributors like me.
>
> I call this bullshit. You can send patches, you can create bug reports.
> Nothing stops you from contributing. It might surprise people, but Open
> Source projects have existed before github or even SF. The methods to
> contribute haven't changed that much...
>
> Joerg
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Monitor 25 network devices or servers for free with OpManager!
> OpManager is web-based network management software that monitors
> network devices and physical & virtual servers, alerts via email & sms
> for fault. Monitor 25 devices for free with no restriction. Download now
> http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/292181274;119417398;o
> _______________________________________________
> Cppcms-users mailing list
> Cpp...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cppcms-users
>

Re: [Cppcms-users] State of the Union

[Marius C. <mf...@gm...>]

 While I do agree that github might make it easier I also have to
admit that there's nothing stopping me or others from contributing by
sending in patches.

On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 6:06 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger
<jo...@br...> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:42:15PM +0900, redred77 wrote:
>> I have started new project with cppcms few weeks ago, and I found several
>> points I can contribute but couldn't do it. Moving to github would give
>> much more contributors like me.
>
> I call this bullshit. You can send patches, you can create bug reports.
> Nothing stops you from contributing. It might surprise people, but Open
> Source projects have existed before github or even SF. The methods to
> contribute haven't changed that much...
>
> Joerg
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Monitor 25 network devices or servers for free with OpManager!
> OpManager is web-based network management software that monitors
> network devices and physical & virtual servers, alerts via email & sms
> for fault. Monitor 25 devices for free with no restriction. Download now
> http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/292181274;119417398;o
> _______________________________________________
> Cppcms-users mailing list
> Cpp...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cppcms-users

Re: [Cppcms-users] State of the Union

[Joerg S. <jo...@br...>]

On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:42:15PM +0900, redred77 wrote:
> I have started new project with cppcms few weeks ago, and I found several
> points I can contribute but couldn't do it. Moving to github would give
> much more contributors like me.

I call this bullshit. You can send patches, you can create bug reports.
Nothing stops you from contributing. It might surprise people, but Open
Source projects have existed before github or even SF. The methods to
contribute haven't changed that much...

Joerg

Re: [Cppcms-users] State of the Union

[redred77 <red...@gm...>]

+1 for github
I really like github than sourceforge. Sourceforge is getting worse these
days. Many of you would have heard news about it.

I have started new project with cppcms few weeks ago, and I found several
points I can contribute but couldn't do it. Moving to github would give
much more contributors like me.

Well, anyway I started to like cppcms and cppdb structure. It's quite well
designed and has powerful security features.
2015. 6. 29. 오후 10:10에 "Marius Cirsta" <mf...@gm...>님이 작성:

> Hi,
>
>  The best to respond to this is Artyom who is the main author and (
> unfortunately ) almost sole contributor but I'll try to answer some of
> the questions.
>
> 1. No idea about this, needs testign but cppcms has a very good
> performance I'd say.
>
> 2. Development seems to have stalled a bit recently but Artyom is
> still maintaining and developing this.
>
> 3. You're not the first to ask for github but Artyom seems to like his
> svn :) and there are also tools that depend on svn from what I
> understand. I think contributions are supposed to be made via sending
> patches but there haven't been too many outside contributions.
>
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 4:01 PM, Tomáš Volf <vol...@gm...> wrote:
> > Greetings all,
> > I'm new here, so I will speak a bit. I was so far interested in Wt,
> > since I have Qt background and it was quite familiar. But it's getting
> > more and more annoying. So I looked around and found CppCMS. Which
> > honestly looks good. I would like to ask just three questions:
> >
> > 1) How does CppCMS compare to Wt in matter of performance for high
> > number of concurrent users? Concrete deployment would be FastCGI
> > behind nginx if that's relevant.
> >
> > 2) How is development of CppCMS looking? Last commit seems to be over
> > two months old (20th of april). Is this project still active in any
> > meaningful way?
> >
> > 3) Was moving project from sourceforge and svn to let's say github and
> > git ever considered?
> >   3.1) I think git (and github) got a lot of traction recently and it
> > could bring more patches and pull request. Since lot of people
> > (including me) remembers days of working with SVN as pure hell before
> > finally starting using git.
> >   3.2) Sourceforge got a lot of bad press recently and it's practices
> > aren't the best, quite a few project are migrating from sourceforge in
> > response to that. Was leaving sourceforge ever considered?
> > But mainly the git > svn part.
> >
> > Thanks for answers,
> > Tomas Volf
> >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Monitor 25 network devices or servers for free with OpManager!
> > OpManager is web-based network management software that monitors
> > network devices and physical & virtual servers, alerts via email & sms
> > for fault. Monitor 25 devices for free with no restriction. Download now
> > http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/292181274;119417398;o
> > _______________________________________________
> > Cppcms-users mailing list
> > Cpp...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cppcms-users
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Monitor 25 network devices or servers for free with OpManager!
> OpManager is web-based network management software that monitors
> network devices and physical & virtual servers, alerts via email & sms
> for fault. Monitor 25 devices for free with no restriction. Download now
> http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/292181274;119417398;o
> _______________________________________________
> Cppcms-users mailing list
> Cpp...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cppcms-users
>

[Cppcms-users] Commercial license

[Tomáš V. <vol...@gm...>]

Greetings,
I have another question regarding commercial license, specifically
point 3.1. What was the reasoning behind it? I think I never saw
anything like that. Because it forbids you from making short proof of
concept in few frameworks (e.g. CppCMS and Wt) and that selecting the
best one and buying the license for that. Which seems... weird.

I curious about reason for this.

Have a nice day,
Tomas Volf

Re: [Cppcms-users] State of the Union

[Marius C. <mf...@gm...>]

Hi,

 The best to respond to this is Artyom who is the main author and (
unfortunately ) almost sole contributor but I'll try to answer some of
the questions.

1. No idea about this, needs testign but cppcms has a very good
performance I'd say.

2. Development seems to have stalled a bit recently but Artyom is
still maintaining and developing this.

3. You're not the first to ask for github but Artyom seems to like his
svn :) and there are also tools that depend on svn from what I
understand. I think contributions are supposed to be made via sending
patches but there haven't been too many outside contributions.

On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 4:01 PM, Tomáš Volf <vol...@gm...> wrote:
> Greetings all,
> I'm new here, so I will speak a bit. I was so far interested in Wt,
> since I have Qt background and it was quite familiar. But it's getting
> more and more annoying. So I looked around and found CppCMS. Which
> honestly looks good. I would like to ask just three questions:
>
> 1) How does CppCMS compare to Wt in matter of performance for high
> number of concurrent users? Concrete deployment would be FastCGI
> behind nginx if that's relevant.
>
> 2) How is development of CppCMS looking? Last commit seems to be over
> two months old (20th of april). Is this project still active in any
> meaningful way?
>
> 3) Was moving project from sourceforge and svn to let's say github and
> git ever considered?
>   3.1) I think git (and github) got a lot of traction recently and it
> could bring more patches and pull request. Since lot of people
> (including me) remembers days of working with SVN as pure hell before
> finally starting using git.
>   3.2) Sourceforge got a lot of bad press recently and it's practices
> aren't the best, quite a few project are migrating from sourceforge in
> response to that. Was leaving sourceforge ever considered?
> But mainly the git > svn part.
>
> Thanks for answers,
> Tomas Volf
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Monitor 25 network devices or servers for free with OpManager!
> OpManager is web-based network management software that monitors
> network devices and physical & virtual servers, alerts via email & sms
> for fault. Monitor 25 devices for free with no restriction. Download now
> http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/292181274;119417398;o
> _______________________________________________
> Cppcms-users mailing list
> Cpp...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cppcms-users

[Cppcms-users] State of the Union

[Tomáš V. <vol...@gm...>]

Greetings all,
I'm new here, so I will speak a bit. I was so far interested in Wt,
since I have Qt background and it was quite familiar. But it's getting
more and more annoying. So I looked around and found CppCMS. Which
honestly looks good. I would like to ask just three questions:

1) How does CppCMS compare to Wt in matter of performance for high
number of concurrent users? Concrete deployment would be FastCGI
behind nginx if that's relevant.

2) How is development of CppCMS looking? Last commit seems to be over
two months old (20th of april). Is this project still active in any
meaningful way?

3) Was moving project from sourceforge and svn to let's say github and
git ever considered?
  3.1) I think git (and github) got a lot of traction recently and it
could bring more patches and pull request. Since lot of people
(including me) remembers days of working with SVN as pure hell before
finally starting using git.
  3.2) Sourceforge got a lot of bad press recently and it's practices
aren't the best, quite a few project are migrating from sourceforge in
response to that. Was leaving sourceforge ever considered?
But mainly the git > svn part.

Thanks for answers,
Tomas Volf

Re: [Cppcms-users] Current Develoment

[Artyom B. <art...@ya...>]

Actually I had recently started some internal reorganization of what is called "cgi_api" implementations (HTTP/FastCGI/SCGI) to switch the from a current pro-actor implementation to reactor + state machine based one with simplification of all I/O stuff and allow much more transparent hooking into various request stages.
As part of it WebSockets can be implemented.
BTW, with a little bit of code hacking I managed to create output web sockets (not input ones) on the current code base butbefore implementing it code reorganization is required and I work on it.
Also I must warn you, WebSockets are great mostly on paper as they don't really work with most HTTP proxies. (like any mobile provider or half of the work places) so unless you run all of them over HTTPS - they wouldn't work (tested it)
So unless you implement real time game with stuff like WebGL I'd suggest to stick to EventStream (which BTW can be implemented relatively easily even in IE10 with partial XHR) and post data with XHR.
 
Artyom Beilis
--------------
CppCMS - C++ Web Framework:   http://cppcms.com/
CppDB - C++ SQL Connectivity: http://cppcms.com/sql/cppdb/
 
    

  From: Marcel Hellwig <ke...@co...>
 To: cpp...@li... 
 Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2015 11:27 AM
 Subject: Re: [Cppcms-users] Current Develoment
   
As this is quite old (2 Months) I'd like to renew this topic.
I'd really like to see new features in cppcms, e.g. websockets, but I
don't see any progress since last year and it annoys me. I know you
don't like to hear it, but github is a really powerful and great
platform and yes, they support svn.
I would love to implement a first draft for the websockets, but I refuse
to hear excuses to not integrate the community in this framework.
There are tickets from 2010, 12, and 13 (14, 15 of course too) still open.
I really like the framework and everything else, but I'd love to see the
community be a part of this project. Currently they are "only" active
mailing list users, but concerning the code development? Nope. I see a
single commit that is not from artyom-beilis and that is from
'mtonkikh'. (isn't your nickname, is it?)

And that's something you have to change. I hope you understand my
feelings and I hope, that some other users feel the same way I do.
Please don't drive this project to the ground.

Regards,
Marcel



------------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Cppcms-users mailing list
Cpp...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cppcms-users


   

Re: [Cppcms-users] Current Develoment

[Marcel H. <ke...@co...>]

As this is quite old (2 Months) I'd like to renew this topic.
I'd really like to see new features in cppcms, e.g. websockets, but I
don't see any progress since last year and it annoys me. I know you
don't like to hear it, but github is a really powerful and great
platform and yes, they support svn.
I would love to implement a first draft for the websockets, but I refuse
to hear excuses to not integrate the community in this framework.
There are tickets from 2010, 12, and 13 (14, 15 of course too) still open.
I really like the framework and everything else, but I'd love to see the
community be a part of this project. Currently they are "only" active
mailing list users, but concerning the code development? Nope. I see a
single commit that is not from artyom-beilis and that is from
'mtonkikh'. (isn't your nickname, is it?)

And that's something you have to change. I hope you understand my
feelings and I hope, that some other users feel the same way I do.
Please don't drive this project to the ground.

Regards,
Marcel

Re: [Cppcms-users] Why a single view per content class?

[Joerg S. <jo...@br...>]

On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 12:56:09AM -0600, Erasmo Aguilera wrote:
> "As a rule of thumb we name them the same way as the corresponding content
> classes."
> 
> According to this statement, one should have a single view per model
> (content) class.

No, it just means that such a correspondence is typical.

> However this does not fit well to the concept of view, as its primary intent
> is to potentially provide several representations of the same model. For
> example, one might want a Create, Edit and Read view of a same model of
> class Employee.

I would still have a separate content class for each view. Note that you
can use inheritance or membership to factor out common entries. The
advantage of separate classes is you get a certain degree of type
safety.

Joerg

[Cppcms-users] Why a single view per content class?

[Erasmo A. <eag...@ho...>]

Hello,

 

I was reading the Using Templates section of the CppCMS tutorial:
http://cppcms.com/wikipp/en/page/cppcms_1x_tut_hello_templates#The.template,
and the following statement referring to views caught my eye:

 

"As a rule of thumb we name them the same way as the corresponding content
classes."

 

According to this statement, one should have a single view per model
(content) class.

 

However this does not fit well to the concept of view, as its primary intent
is to potentially provide several representations of the same model. For
example, one might want a Create, Edit and Read view of a same model of
class Employee.

 

So why does the tutorial say the view should be named the same as the
content class?

 

 

Erasmo.

Re: [Cppcms-users] Template language MIME type.

[Marcel H. <ke...@co...>]

You could try asp.net  templates. It could work, but I won't rely on the
syntax highlight of some IDEs. Use vim ;) *joke*

Greetings,
Marcel

[Cppcms-users] Template language MIME type.

[Erasmo A. <eag...@ho...>]

Hello,

 

I'd like to know if there is a registered MIME type
(http://www.iana.org/assignments/media-types/media-types.xhtml) for the
language used by the CppCMS template system.

 

The reason is because I am currently using CppCMS on NetBeans IDE, and
associating template files with an appropriate MIME type would provide
correct syntax recognition. I tried using "text/html", but syntax errors
show up even for correct code, mainly because of the <% %> tag delimiters
(which are not part of HTML).

 

Any suggestion is welcome.

 

 

Erasmo.

[Cppcms-users] mistake in a documentation

[Sydunenko O. <ovs...@gm...>]

Hi All,
I think that i found the error in description, maybe i wrong, please 
correct me
In the doxygen documentation for the "application" class in function 
"attach" with 5 parameters mention "mount" function of the 
"url_dispatcher" class, where the 2nd parameter are pointer! But. For 
the "url_dispatcher" class "mount" function are described only with 
reference for 2nd parameter.

-- 
Regards,
Oleg Sydunenko

Re: [Cppcms-users] Problem with running example - "message_board"

[Artyom B. <art...@ya...>]

As the error message said:
cppdb::driver failed to load driver sqlite3 - no module found
 So... you either hadn't compiled cppdb with sqlite3 support or hadn't intalled it incorrectly.
Artyom Beilis
--------------
CppCMS - C++ Web Framework:   http://cppcms.com/
CppDB - C++ SQL Connectivity: http://cppcms.com/sql/cppdb/
 
      From: Sydunenko Oleg <ovs...@gm...>
 To: art...@ya...; cpp...@li... 
 Sent: Friday, April 24, 2015 4:11 PM
 Subject: [Cppcms-users] Problem with running example - "message_board"
   
  Hi all,
 
 I had problem with example "message_board".
 
 After startup with command "./mb -c config.js" the error "2015-04-24 16:05:50; cppcms, error: Caught exception [cppdb::driver failed to load driver sqlite3 - no module found] (http_context.cpp:139)" is appear in console and browser had 500 response code...
 
 Thanks in advance
 
 -- 
Regards,
Oleg Sydunenko 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud 
Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications
Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights
Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y
_______________________________________________
Cppcms-users mailing list
Cpp...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cppcms-users


   

Re: [Cppcms-users] Problem with running example - "message_board"

[kpeo <sla...@ya...>]

<div>Oh, sure - the message was for Oleg, not Alexander. Sorry )</div><div> </div><div>24.04.2015, 16:47, "Oleg Sydunenko" &lt;ovs...@gm...&gt;:</div><blockquote type="cite"><p>Where is logs located ? I could not find any information about logs in config.js file...</p><div>24 апр. 2015 г. 16:42 пользователь "Alexander Mack" &lt;<a href="mailto:a....@ev...">a....@ev...</a>&gt; написал:<br type="attribution" /><blockquote style="margin:0 0 0 0.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><div bgcolor="#FFFFFF">Hi,<br /> <br /> Did you check if the library is accessable through /usr/lib?<br /> And, did you look into the logs? Maybe they have some helpful informations.<br /> <br /> Hope that helps you.<br /> <br /> Alex<br /> <br /> <br /><div>Am 24.04.2015 um 15:24 schrieb Sydunenko Oleg:</div><blockquote type="cite"><div>On 04/24/2015 04:15 PM, Alexander Mack wrote:</div><blockquote type="cite">Hi,<br /> <br /> have you tried to install the sqlite3 libs on your system?<br /> On Ubuntu you would do that with apt-get install:<br /> <br /> sudo apt-get install sqlite3 libsqlite3-dev<br /> <br /> <br /><div>Am 24.04.2015 um 15:11 schrieb Sydunenko Oleg:</div><blockquote type="cite">Hi all,<br /> <br /> I had problem with example "message_board".<br /> <br /> After startup with command <i>"./mb -c config.js"</i> the error <i>"<span>2015-04-24 16</span>:05:50; cppcms, error: Caught exception [cppdb::driver failed to load driver sqlite3 - no module found]</i><i> (http_context.cpp:139)</i><i>"</i> is appear in console and browser had 500 response code...<br /> <br /> Thanks in advance<br /> <br /><pre>-- 
Regards,
Oleg Sydunenko</pre><br /> <br /><pre>------------------------------------------------------------------------------
One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud 
Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications
Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights
Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight.
<a href="http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y" target="_blank">http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y</a></pre><br /> <br /><pre>_______________________________________________
Cppcms-users mailing list
<a href="mailto:Cpp...@li..." target="_blank">Cpp...@li...</a>
<a href="https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cppcms-users" target="_blank">https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cppcms-users</a>
</pre></blockquote><br /> <br /> <br /><pre>------------------------------------------------------------------------------
One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud 
Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications
Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights
Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight.
<a href="http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y" target="_blank">http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y</a></pre><br /> <br /><pre>_______________________________________________
Cppcms-users mailing list
<a href="mailto:Cpp...@li..." target="_blank">Cpp...@li...</a>
<a href="https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cppcms-users" target="_blank">https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cppcms-users</a>
</pre></blockquote>The result of the <i>"dpkg --get-selections | grep sqlite"</i> is:<br /> libmono-sqlite4.0-cil                install<br /> libqt4-sql-sqlite                install<br /> libsqlite3-0                    install<br /> libsqlite3-dev                    install<br /> libwtdbosqlite-dev                install<br /> libwtdbosqlite29                install<br /> sqlite3                        install<br /> <br /><pre>-- 
Regards,
Oleg Sydunenko</pre><br /> <br /><pre>------------------------------------------------------------------------------
One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud 
Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications
Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights
Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight.
<a href="http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y" target="_blank">http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y</a></pre><br /> <br /><pre>_______________________________________________
Cppcms-users mailing list
<a href="mailto:Cpp...@li..." target="_blank">Cpp...@li...</a>
<a href="https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cppcms-users" target="_blank">https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cppcms-users</a>
</pre></blockquote></div><br />------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br /> One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud<br /> Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications<br /> Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights<br /> Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight.<br /> <a href="http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y" target="_blank">http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y</a><br />_______________________________________________<br /> Cppcms-users mailing list<br /> <a href="mailto:Cpp...@li...">Cpp...@li...</a><br /> <a href="https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cppcms-users" target="_blank">https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cppcms-users</a><br /> </blockquote></div>,<p>------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br />One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud <br />Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications<br />Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights<br />Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight.<br /><a href="http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y">http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y</a></p>,<p>_______________________________________________<br />Cppcms-users mailing list<br /><a href="mailto:Cpp...@li...">Cpp...@li...</a><br /><a href="https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cppcms-users">https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cppcms-users</a></p></blockquote>

Re: [Cppcms-users] Problem with running example - "message_board"

[kpeo <sla...@ya...>]

Hi Alexander,

Please, check HowTo: http://cppcms.com/wikipp/en/page/cppcms_1x_howto
"How to activate CppCMS logging"

You can find more details here:
http://cppcms.com/wikipp/en/page/cppcms_1x_config#logging

Best regards,
Vladimir

24.04.2015, 16:47, "Oleg Sydunenko" <ovs...@gm...>:
> Where is logs located ? I could not find any information about logs in config.js file...
>
> 24 апр. 2015 г. 16:42 пользователь "Alexander Mack" <a....@ev...> написал:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Did you check if the library is accessable through /usr/lib?
>> And, did you look into the logs? Maybe they have some helpful informations.
>>
>> Hope that helps you.
>>
>> Alex
>>
>> Am 24.04.2015 um 15:24 schrieb Sydunenko Oleg:
>>
>>> On 04/24/2015 04:15 PM, Alexander Mack wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> have you tried to install the sqlite3 libs on your system?
>>>> On Ubuntu you would do that with apt-get install:
>>>>
>>>> sudo apt-get install sqlite3 libsqlite3-dev
>>>>
>>>> Am 24.04.2015 um 15:11 schrieb Sydunenko Oleg:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> I had problem with example "message_board".
>>>>>
>>>>> After startup with command "./mb -c config.js" the error "2015-04-24 16:05:50; cppcms, error: Caught exception [cppdb::driver failed to load driver sqlite3 - no module found] (http_context.cpp:139)" is appear in console and browser had 500 response code...
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks in advance
>>>>>
>>>>> -- Regards, Oleg Sydunenko
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight. http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________ Cppcms-users mailing list Cpp...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cppcms-users
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight. http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________ Cppcms-users mailing list Cpp...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cppcms-users
>>> The result of the "dpkg --get-selections | grep sqlite" is:
>>> libmono-sqlite4.0-cil                install
>>> libqt4-sql-sqlite                install
>>> libsqlite3-0                    install
>>> libsqlite3-dev                    install
>>> libwtdbosqlite-dev                install
>>> libwtdbosqlite29                install
>>> sqlite3                        install
>>>
>>> -- Regards, Oleg Sydunenko
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight. http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________ Cppcms-users mailing list Cpp...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cppcms-users
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud
>> Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications
>> Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights
>> Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight.
>> http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y
>> _______________________________________________
>> Cppcms-users mailing list
>> Cpp...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cppcms-users
> ,
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud
> Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications
> Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights
> Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight.
> http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y
> ,
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cppcms-users mailing list
> Cpp...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cppcms-users