Re: [cpp-netlib-devel] Sourceforge tracker

[Dean M. B. <mik...@gm...>]

Sorry for taking a while. Let me share my views below:

On Dec 11, 2007 9:46 PM, Glyn Matthews <gly...@gm...> wrote:
> Dear group,
>
>
> I've added a category and group to the feature tracker following on from the
> discussion about the HTTPParser from Pion.  Furthermore, I also added a task
> (HTTP integration).
>

Thanks Glyn!

> I'd like to know your opinions on how to best organise the SVN repository,
> tracker and task manager.  Currently, my thoughts are:
>
> A task corresponds to a separate branch in SVN (e.g. HTTP integration,
> version 1.0 etc.).  Feature requests are assigned to a group which
> corresponds to a task.  A feature request can also belong to a category
> which might be more descriptive ( e.g. documentation, security ...)
>
> Is there anything else?  If anyone wants to start working on something,
> create a task and an SVN branch and use this (I don't have access to the SVN
> repository here, so if someone wants to create a branch for the HTTP
> integration, please go ahead).  If you want me to add more categories and
> tasks, let me know.
>

I like this approach. If someone would care to start this without me
in the meantime (I'm not getting much free time now that some of the
projects I'm working on are reaching the deployment stages, I'm having
less and less time to spare for open source development).

Thanks very much Glyn!

-- 
Dean Michael C. Berris
Software Engineer, Friendster, Inc.
[http://cplusplus-soup.blogspot.com/]
[mik...@gm...]
[+63 928 7291459]
[+1 408 4049523]