Re: [cpp-netlib-devel] Pion's HTTPParser

[Alex O. <al...@gm...>]

Hi

On Dec 11, 2007 9:22 AM, Dean Michael Berris <mik...@gm...> wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> On Dec 11, 2007 4:14 PM, Alex Ott <al...@gm...> wrote:
> >
> > i had looked into protocol/http/impl/request.hpp and had seen, that it
> > include URI parser. i think, that it better to implement URI parser in
> > their own namespace, as it could be used not only in http parsing, but
> > also in other places.
>
> Yup, I agree. I intend to refactor those out later -- but that would
> mean there would be tons of tests just to make sure that the parser is
> correct. That sounds like a lot of work, but if you'd like to try that
> out, please be my guest. :)

Yes, i for a long time looking for this project in SVN

> > Also, may be it will be useful during implementation - may be not hard
> > code "HTTP" protocol name in parser, but specify it as template
> > parameter? I suggest this, as some other protocols (such as ICAP), use
> > the same structure as HTTP, but different protocol name
> >
>
> This makes sense.
>
> Please add a task in the tracker -- Glyn, do you have an idea how to
> best use the Sourceforge Trackers?

Ok, add

> > P.S. i has almost working http request/response parsers, but i has
> > some problems with mixing boost::spirit + std::multimap.
> > I use following structures to hold information about request/response
> > (and corresponding parsers):
> I'm not sure what you're trying to accomplish though, so it's hard to
> comment. I've found out that with Boost.Spirit, it's usually best that
> you use semantic actions built with Phoenix. I'm not sure if there
> have been major changes with Phoenix the past few months, and having
> seen Boost.Spirit being release-ready in Boost Trunk, it would be a
> good idea to use those instead.
>
> Having said that, we should be updating the sources that require
> Fusion -- there have been breaking changes with the directory
> structure since we last tested the code, but unfortunately I don't
> have time yet to get to those.

Ok, i switch to fusion & phoenix, and try to help you in implementing
http parsers - i'm currently writer several projects, that require
http parsing, so we'll has good test cases ;-)

-- 
With best wishes,                    Alex Ott, MBA
http://alexott.blogspot.com/
http://alexott-ru.blogspot.com/
http://content-filtering.blogspot.com/
http://xtalk.msk.su/~ott/