Re: [cpp-netlib-devel] Some code already up in subversion

[Christian H. <chh...@gm...>]

Hi guys,

>
> I agree that boost/network/rfc2822 doesn't feel natural. Would you
> have a different name from rfc2822 which might make more sense and be
> more descriptive? It might also even make sense that we can put it in
> boost/network/smtp/parser/ and have a boost/network/smtp/parsers.hpp
> file (just in case I understand that the parsers are for SMTP
> parsing).
>

Why not have the parser in boost/network/parsers/. Since some parsers
are used in more than one protocol I don't think we should order them
based on protocols. I think we should split them as much as we can,
like in the rfc2822 lib. Although here I would change the namespace.

Christian