Re: [cpp-netlib-devel] rfc2822 parsers

[Dean M. B. <mik...@gm...>]

On 18 May 2007 21:16:37 +0200, Peter Simons <si...@cr...> wrote:
> Hi Dean,
>
> personally, I would prefer sticking to std::tm as the result type
> of choice for the date parser. I wouldn't want to introduce a
> dependency on Boost.Date_time unless I have to. Manipulating a
> std::tm timestamp with the date_time library is simple enough
> from the on.
>

Agreed. :) I was just wondering aloud. :D

-- 
Dean Michael C. Berris
http://cplusplus-soup.blogspot.com/
mikhailberis AT gmail DOT com
+63 928 7291459