Re: [cpp-netlib-devel] rfc2822 parsers

[Christian H. <chh...@gm...>]

I can second that. If you only need to parse some string to generate
std::tm structure than I would think we don't need boost::date_time.

Thanks Peter, for your fix. It's not quite the working though ;-) The
output now is:

1982-06-12 01:00:00

Seems to me that the time value is off by an hour. When looking inside
the std::tm structure the tm_hour member is 1.

Christian


On 18 May 2007 21:16:37 +0200, Peter Simons <si...@cr...> wrote:
> Hi Dean,
>
> personally, I would prefer sticking to std::tm as the result type
> of choice for the date parser. I wouldn't want to introduce a
> dependency on Boost.Date_time unless I have to. Manipulating a
> std::tm timestamp with the date_time library is simple enough
> from the on.
>
> Just my 0.02 Euros,
> Peter
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
> Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
> control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
> http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
> _______________________________________________
> Cpp-netlib-devel mailing list
> Cpp...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cpp-netlib-devel
>