From: Peter S. <si...@cr...> - 2007-05-18 19:16:49
|
Hi Dean, personally, I would prefer sticking to std::tm as the result type of choice for the date parser. I wouldn't want to introduce a dependency on Boost.Date_time unless I have to. Manipulating a std::tm timestamp with the date_time library is simple enough from the on. Just my 0.02 Euros, Peter |