From: Dean M. B. <mik...@gm...> - 2010-09-03 17:46:10
|
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Dean Michael Berris <mik...@gm...> wrote: > > Ah, right. I haven't considered that -- no tests cover the uri > directive at this time (except for the concept checks). MSVC 2010 > doesn't complain about the URI function and the URI type having the > same name though, so I can't say what the fix should be. I'll try > building it in my Ubuntu desktop to see if I can make it build > correctly with GCC soon. > > It would be great if you can send me a pull request so that I can test > on Windows with MSVC 2010 as well on my repo. > I tried working with clang and I can say that it's way better in pointing out errors. And it's also lightning fast compared to GCC -- it compiles everything in 30% less time. I highly recommend developing with clang instead of GCC on Linux -- even for just the error messages. I'm going to keep whacking at this as I go along, so please expect things to be in a flux on the 0.7-devel branch. Sorry about the breakage, but some of the refactorings were a little hairy and is getting very involved. At some point a real cleanup of the implementation has to be done (by me). Help would most definitely be appreciated. Have a great weekend guys! -- Dean Michael Berris deanberris.com |