From: Jeroen H. <vex...@gm...> - 2010-01-10 13:51:55
|
Hi Dean, On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 05:56, Dean Michael Berris <mik...@gm...> wrote: > Hi Jeroen! > > I apologize for taking a while to respond. I've been away from my > computer for the better part of this Christmas break and I've only > gotten back to my mail now. Please see my response below. > > On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 3:12 AM, Jeroen Habraken <vex...@gm...> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Firstly, thank you Dean for merging my current fork. > > You're welcome! Thanks for the contributions also. :) > >> This however has >> gotten me confused with github, can I still use my current fork to >> continue development (which I suspect will be broken more often, as >> bigger changes are coming), or is it easier to create a new fork. If a >> new fork is easier, what branch should I fork ? >> > > Yes, you can continue to use your fork to continue development. What I > suggest you do is learn how to track a remote branch using git, and > then continue development on 0.5-devel -- or if you prefer, create a > branch on your github fork then do your development from there. > Because you're doing development against the master branch, I'll > integrate your work to my master branch only when you feel it's safe > to integrate to master on your end. > > So the steps would be: > > 1. Create a branch on your fork for your development > 2. Continue development on your branch > 3. Once you're ready to integrate more work in, make sure your master > branch is sync'ed with my master branch > 4. Merge your work from your branch to your master branch > 5. Send me a pull request message and I will integrate to my > fork-integration branch, then integrate to master > > I hope this makes sense. > > Have a great week ahead and I hope you're having a great and restful > holiday season! > > -- > Dean Michael Berris > blog.cplusplus-soup.com | twitter.com/mikhailberis > linkedin.com/in/mikhailberis | facebook.com/dean.berris | deanberris.com > Just found the Fork Queue and I think I've got the basics of github figured. I found a bug in the current code on github where I was using the Spirit > operator instead of >>, which could lead to exceptions being thrown, and made a pull request for that. Next I'll try to merge my code with the new parser to the 0.5-devel branch of my fork as I'm already working in a 0.5-devel checkout Yours, Jeroen |