From: Jeroen H. <vex...@gm...> - 2009-12-18 23:44:57
|
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 00:28, Dean Michael Berris <mik...@gm...> wrote: > On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 12:15 AM, Jeroen Habraken <vex...@gm...> wrote: >> >> This is indeed a bit complex, and it was meant as something to play >> with, so by all means, please do. >> > > Alright, thanks very much! I'll do it within the day or in the next > few days. Please expect it in the 0.5-devel branch. > > BTW, are you already happy with the implementation you have at github? > Because if you are, please feel free to submit a pull request so that > I can merge it to master -- and rebase my 0.5-devel branch too. > The current planning is that I fix the user and password parsing Real Soon Now, along with some test cases, which can then be merged. That should at least get us to a point where we are somewhat following the RFC2396, thus falsely marked valid URI's, but no falsely marked invalid URI's I hope. Next is reading the newer RFC again -and again :)-, setting up a lot more test cases, and fixing the generic URI implementation to follow that. > Thanks and I hope to see the pull request soon! > > -- > Dean Michael Berris > blog.cplusplus-soup.com | twitter.com/mikhailberis > linkedin.com/in/mikhailberis | facebook.com/dean.berris | deanberris.com > Jeroen |