From: Dean M. B. <mik...@gm...> - 2009-12-09 13:58:33
|
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 4:30 AM, Glyn Matthews <gly...@gm...> wrote: > > 2009/12/8 Dean Michael Berris <mik...@gm...> >> >> December 16, 2009 >> * Freeze the Subversion tree >> * Import the Subversion tree to Github >> * All further development will be done on Github, mailing lists and >> release management stays in Sourceforge >> * Issues are migrated from Trac to Github Issues, and Wiki Pages >> will be migrated to Github too > > I understood we were moving to Git, but we're moving completely away from > sourceforge? Why is this? I already have an account on Github, but I can't > say I'm familiar with it yet. > The easy "forking" nature available in Github as well as a spiffier interface allows for better development on a per-contributor basis. The limiting nature of a single subversion repository causes the same problem that the Boost single subversion repository brings in. I don't think there's anything similar with Sourceforge and that's the only reason I want to move to Github. >> >> December 24, 2009 >> * Branch for 0.5 which will include: >> - HTTPS support >> - HTTP Server >> > > For most of this I think you'll be working on your own, so the schedule is > down to you. I will be completely away until the middle of January. > I actually think the branching for 0.5 should happen earlier, but I was thinking maybe bug reports will need to be addressed for 0.4 before we branch for 0.5. >> >> January 30, 2009 >> * Release 0.5 >> > > You're the only one who knows if this is a reliable target. I will be very > interested in seeing progress. > Alright. :) -- Dean Michael Berris blog.cplusplus-soup.com | twitter.com/mikhailberis linkedin.com/in/mikhailberis | facebook.com/dean.berris | deanberris.com |