From: Dean M. B. <mik...@gm...> - 2009-12-04 20:47:16
|
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 12:11 AM, Dean Michael Berris <mik...@gm...> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 11:48 PM, Dean Michael Berris > <mik...@gm...> wrote: >> In a matter of minutes (after doing the final test run on the merged >> trunk I have locally) I will be checking in the merged integration_0_4 >> branch into trunk. Any further documentation and testing should happen >> against the trunk version, so that we can stabilize and tag release >> 0.4. >> > > This is done. > > All further stabilization should happen on the trunk; I'm branching > off http_server and pushing code there from r211. I shall be re-basing > on a regular basis. > This is done too; r213 now contains the HTTP Server template along with all required support headers. There is a test that requires Python 3000 (should we move the Python implementation of the server to Python 3000 too?) and httplib2 for Python 3000. What I would like to get comments on are: 1. Whether we want to support request pipelining on the server side. 2. Whether we want to make it more like a Java framework. 3. Whether we want to unify the request object that the HTTP server currently uses and the request object that the HTTP client users. 4. What you would like to see in the HTTP Server implementation aside from full standard HTTP 1.1 support. Please spread the word and let's get this implementation going! -- Dean Michael Berris blog.cplusplus-soup.com | twitter.com/mikhailberis linkedin.com/in/mikhailberis | facebook.com/dean.berris | deanberris.com |