Re: [cpp-netlib-devel] Updates on urllib-dean branch

[John P. F. <jf...@ov...>]

Dean Michael Berris wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 8:56 PM, John P. Feltz <jf...@ov...> wrote:
>   
>> I don't see any compelling reason for either git vs svn or sf vs github.
>> I only see a time cost that would be better spent on actually improving
>> the library. Merging in SVN from what I've seen is fairly trivial, it is
>> the design decisions that are hard -and those can be addressed through
>> work on the specs and subsequent division between Dean and myself
>> (currently).
>>
>>     
>
> I am not sure where the division is though. What I have stated before
> about how to go forward has been clear in both my mind and the code
> I've written. The tests are the specification for what features I'm
> looking for in a header-only URI library.
>   
Testing code is fine, however among other benefits, a document is easier 
to use for reaching consensus prior to coding (a much more laborious 
process without that).

> Let me know how I can close the division from my end.
>   
I was referring to the benefit of a clear division of labor that 
documents and people help establish.

John