Re: [cpp-netlib-devel] Merge to Trunk, Preparing for the Pain

[Kim G. <kim...@gm...>]

Hi Dean,

On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 12:24, Dean Michael
Berris<mik...@gm...> wrote:
>
> Makes sense... However, my only concern here is that the simplicity of
> using the free function parse_specific and relying on ADL to pick up
> the correct implementation.

Ah, I see -- the ADL overload aspect didn't occur to me.

> Although I guess it should be easy to make 'parse' a public static
> function so we don't have to instantiate the scheme_specific_parser<>.

Oops, yeah, that's what I meant -- I missed the 'static'. But does
that sort out the ADL-based implementation selection? We probably need
a wrapper function that delegates to the scheme_specific_parser, no?

> I like it! :D When do I expect a patch and passing tests? :D

Maybe when I have more than 6 continuous minutes/day of time to myself ;-)

- Kim