Re: [cpp-netlib-devel] Collabaration methods [Was Re: Help! Grammar for parsing HTTP URLs]

[Dean M. B. <mik...@gm...>]

Hi Guys!

Sorry to be late in this discussion... Let me chime in a little.

On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 4:23 AM, Glyn Matthews<gly...@gm...> wrote:
>
> Right, 100% agreed.  It's very difficult to see how to proceed without some
> kind of roadmap or vision for what we think this project should become.  I
> think that Trac is a great improvement over the old sf wiki so we should
> take advantage of this.  I've already added two empty pages (one each for
> requirements and specification), so at least we can discuss and document
> this.
>

It has been all on me -- having not been able to articulate (or at
least write down) the exact goals (apart from what's already in the
RATIONALE document) of the project, or a roadmap at least of what I
would have wanted the project to accomplish in the first place.

To me, it's very clear in my mind. For a prolific blogger though, I've
been remiss in writing these thoughts down so that I can get others to
see what I see in my mind as well.

> I added some pages to the wiki for these:
> http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/cpp-netlib/wiki/ProjectRequirements
> http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/cpp-netlib/wiki/SoftwareSpecification
>
> Please comment.
>

I'm currently in the process of writing down my thoughts on the pages.
I don't know what exact format you guys would like, but like Open
Source, I'll just write what's in my head and just iterate -- with the
help of others of course who care to join in on the editing/shaping of
the library.

Thanks for this much needed discussion and eye opener. I'll do my best
to get as much out of my head and written down on the Wiki for
everyone's benefit.

Have a good day everyone! :)

-- 
Dean Michael Berris
blog.cplusplus-soup.com | twitter.com/mikhailberis
linkedin.com/in/mikhailberis | facebook.com/dean.berris | deanberris.com