From: Rodrigo M. <rod...@gm...> - 2008-11-04 15:09:03
|
> > Are you talking about Boost.Array? Because the last time I checked, > Boost.Array is statically-sized and is not as flexible as an > std::string. IMO, using something from the STL is "better" because you > don't need to rely on Boost being there to use the library. I won't > even be surprised if it was possible to package the header-only Boost > libs with cpp-netlib as a "standalone" download (with the help perhaps > of bcp). Of course if we're using Boost.Asio we rely on Boost.System > -- but other than that I'm confident there shouldn't be a lot of other > libraries cpp-netlib would rely on (of course aside from the STL). > I'm curious, why std::string and not std::vector<char>? Thanks, Rodrigo |