Re: [cpp-netlib-devel] Binary parsers

[Rodrigo M. <rod...@gm...>]

Hey there Dean,
Basically I see three std::string elements in the message which already make
it strange.
Is there a reason for them that I don't realize?

Also, what is top-posting and overquoting?

Thanks,
Rodrigo

On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 5:36 PM, Dean Michael Berris
<mik...@gm...>wrote:

> Hi Rodrigo,
>
> Sorry it took a while for me to respond. Please see in-lined below.
>
> (BTW, next time please avoid overquoting and top-posting.)
>
> On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 6:06 AM, Rodrigo Madera <rod...@gm...>
> wrote:
> > Thanks again.
> > However the current architecture is not generic enough. It feels like
> HTTP
> > was the only protocol thought about during it's design.
>
> That's odd, the message abstraction is very generic -- it doesn't
> assume anything about the protocols that will be using it.
>
> The structure of a message is really very flexible, and using tags you
> can even completely revamp the way a basic_message<> will look like
> (and how the interface would be) for your context/protocol.
>
> It would be nice to know why you think the architecture is not generic
> enough when being as generic as possible is what the whole library was
> designed to be.
>
> > I'll post my progress here.
>
> Please do, this will be very interesting to us.
>
> Thanks and have a good day!
>
> --
> Dean Michael C. Berris
> Software Engineer, Friendster, Inc.
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's
> challenge
> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great
> prizes
> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
> _______________________________________________
> Cpp-netlib-devel mailing list
> Cpp...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cpp-netlib-devel
>