From: Glyn M. <gly...@gm...> - 2008-10-21 12:53:44
|
Hi Kim, 2008/10/21 Kim Gräsman <kim...@gm...> > > I've gone back and forth between fusion::map and regular members, but > after Dean's suggestions that there are indeed benefits in the fusion > map, I've gone back to the original layout. > > There were also some implicit assumptions that the URI was for HTTP, > with path normalization, etc. I've removed that, so that clients will > need to translate empty path to "/" if necessary, and the same with > the port number. > Do you still intend to keep the host/port in the fusion map? How do you intend to deal with URIs like this: file:///home/user/myfile.txt mailto:som...@ex... ? Or haven't you got that far yet? ;) G |