From: K. G. <kim...@gm...> - 2008-10-10 12:55:57
|
Hi guys, On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 20:39, Glyn Matthews <gly...@gm...> wrote: > > Well it's not really part of the HTTP integration. And it's not much better > doing all development in a single branch than doing it all in trunk. What I > think is best is to develop different tasks in different branches, while > testing against trunk. Ideally, branches should correspond to a > task/subproject on the sf site too. I created a branch succinctly called 'uri', on https://cpp-netlib.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/cpp-netlib/branches/uri I've committed the first fumbling parts there, in /boost/network/uri.hpp and /libs/network/test/uri_test.hpp. At least it's a start, not sure where to go from there... I didn't parameterize the string type mainly because the default tag is under network/protocol/http, and the URI goes one level up in the hierarchy, but I suppose I could introduce a temporary tag to wrap the string typedef. - Kim |