From: Dean M. B. <mik...@gm...> - 2008-09-08 07:01:08
|
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 2:47 PM, Kim Gräsman <kim...@gm...> wrote: > Hi Dean, > > Looks cool! > > On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 07:51, Dean Michael Berris > <mik...@gm...> wrote: >> >> * http::client::follow_redirects / http::client::follow_redirect -- > > I took this to mean there are two options -- what's the difference > between follow_redirects and follow_redirect? How far it follows? > Nope, you can use either option to mean the same thing. >> The following are TODO's related to these two new features: >> - Expiring resolved cached endpoints (configurable?) >> - Limiting the depth of redirect resolution (configurable?) > > This got me thinking about the corner case of circular redirects -- a > depth limit would solve that. Should the limit have a conservative > default? > Right now it doesn't. I'm still thinking about how to go about it. -- Dean Michael C. Berris Software Engineer, Friendster, Inc. |