Re: [cpp-netlib-devel] [RFC] Doxygen Policy

[K. G. <kim...@gm...>]

On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 13:17, Kim Gräsman <kim...@gm...> wrote:
>
> As for documentation, rationale and high-level docs tend to be more
> stable, so I'd focus on that first. Since we're shipping a library,
> though, it makes sense to provide some detailed API documentation. Not
> sure what form is easiest to digest.[..]

... and produce :)

I meant to include a link as well -- James Shore is an XP practitioner
and spokesperson who always seems to hit the nail on the head:
http://jamesshore.com/Agile-Book/documentation.html

Cheers,
- Kim