From: K. G. <kim...@gm...> - 2008-09-03 09:21:23
|
Hi Dean, On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 10:19, Dean Michael Berris <mik...@gm...> wrote: > >> Are we getting closer? :) > > I personally think just marking it an expected failure on Windows with > explicit documentation stating the rationale (citing the Python bug) > would be sufficient. That's what I meant, sorry if I wasn't clear. Now I understand what the test is there for, it didn't occur to me earlier that there should be no difference between text/binary, except /possibly/ for handling of line endings -- if the client treats them both as binary, then that's good. Time to make the server do the same ;-) Thanks, - Kim |