From: K. G. <kim...@gm...> - 2008-09-03 06:29:33
|
Hi Dean, On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 07:47, Dean Michael Berris <mik...@gm...> wrote: > > I think it's all about whether we want to live with the test failure > in Windows based on a perfectly valid test that exposes a bug in > Python in Windows. In this case I think it's alright for us to live > with it -- we can mark it as an expected failure if we're in Windows. I don't see how that's an improvement over saving test.xml with LF-only line endings, and get consistent test results...? I understood Divye's point to be that if we did that, we would mask something else. Wait... OK, I think I see what's happening: 1) test.xml always contains CRLF, even on Linux 2) On Linux, the Python server serves test.xml with CRLF endings intact 3) If we change test.xml to LF-only, we have worse test coverage for line ending independence Is that it? > Perhaps a patch to the test to reflect this would be very welcome. :) It's included in the patch I sent last night -- in Win32 configurations the test code strips all CRs from the source text document. But maybe a dedicated test would be better to demonstrate this. Thanks, - Kim |