Re: [cpp-netlib-devel] Dispatch Table Example

[Divye K. <div...@gm...>]

Hi Kim,

On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 1:45 AM, Kim Gräsman <kim...@gm...> wrote:

> The .exe name is probably triggering one of the UAC heuristics; the OS
> checks the filename of every launched executable, looking for keywords
> that give it away as an installer. Apparently "patch" is one of the
> trigger words [1], so "dis*patch*_table.exe" is incorrectly classified
> as requiring elevation.
>

You're absolutely right. Changing the name of the executable removed the
need of the UAC elevation request.
Thanks :-D


>
> Best bet is probably to change the name of the .cpp file and/or .exe.
> The only alternative I know of is to add a UAC manifest either
> embedded or side-by-side, but that complicates build and deployment
> significantly, compared to the current...
>

Any suggestions for alternative names?

Divye

-- 
An idealist is one who, on noticing that a rose smells better than a
cabbage, concludes that it will also make better soup.
H. L. Mencken (1880 - 1956)
My official web site: http://people.iitr.ernet.in/shp/061305/
Webmaster: http://www.drkapoorsclinic.com
Blog: http://divyekapoor.blogspot.com