From: K. G. <kim...@gm...> - 2008-08-28 19:37:42
|
Hi Divye, On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 20:25, Divye Kapoor <div...@gm...> wrote: > > Users who want such a type of dynamic functionality will have to implement > such a dispatch table in any case. This function could simply provide a > dispatch table for each of the typed functions as a convenient shorthand. It > localizes code that would otherwise have to be rewritten in different > applications. For those who already know the type of request to make, > choosing one of the static methods would still be a better option. +1. That's the point I was trying to make, but much more eloquently put. Thanks! - Kim |