From: Glyn M. <gly...@gm...> - 2008-08-28 15:04:38
|
Kim, 2008/8/28 Kim Gräsman <kim...@gm...> > Hi Glyn, > > On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 13:54, Glyn Matthews <gly...@gm...> > wrote: > > > > 2008/8/28 Kim Gräsman <kim...@gm...> > >> > >> How about user_agent? > > > > Yes, this might be better. "User-Agent" still needs to form part of the > > HTTP request. Dean? > > Thinking further about this, the feeling that *I am the client* is > just as true for *I am the user-agent*, so I don't think it adds any > value in that regard. It's just a different word. I think I like > "client" better. > True, user_agent.get() and user_agent.post() are equally as problematic. G |