Re: [cpp-netlib-devel] Review of http::message

[Dean M. C. B. <dmb...@fr...>]

Okay, so just now I chopped up parser_traits into the following files:
	
network/protocol/http/traits/impl/cookie_name.ipp
network/protocol/http/traits/impl/cookie_value.ipp
network/protocol/http/traits/impl/header_name.ipp
network/protocol/http/traits/impl/header_value.ipp
network/protocol/http/traits/impl/method.ipp
network/protocol/http/traits/impl/post_content.ipp
network/protocol/http/traits/impl/query_name.ipp
network/protocol/http/traits/impl/query_string.ipp
network/protocol/http/traits/impl/query_value.ipp
network/protocol/http/traits/impl/resource.ipp
network/protocol/http/traits/impl/status_message.ipp
network/protocol/http/traits/parser_traits.hpp

In this approach, we then use the tag dispatch to get the appropriate
typedef for the MAX nested static value:

	http::cookie_name<http::message_tag>::MAX; // 1024u

Mike, please let me know when you think we can start changing the parser
implementation(s) to use the newer traits mechanisms.

I like this rate that we're proceeding. I'll try writing more tests to
satisfy some of Divye's curiousity -- or if you're already trying your
hand at those Divye, please let me know so we can coordinate
accordingly.

Have a good day guys!

--
Dean Michael Berris
Software Engineer, Friendster, Inc.
<dmb...@fr...>
+639287291459
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cpp...@li... 
> [mailto:cpp...@li...] On 
> Behalf Of Dean Michael C. Berris
> Sent: Monday, April 21, 2008 2:15 PM
> To: C++ Networking Library Developers Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [cpp-netlib-devel] Review of http::message
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: cpp...@li...
> > [mailto:cpp...@li...] On 
> Behalf Of 
> > Michael Dickey
> > Sent: Monday, April 21, 2008 4:20 AM
> > To: C++ Networking Library Developers Mailing List
> > Subject: Re: [cpp-netlib-devel] Review of http::message
> > 
> > The new approach sounds (and now, looks) good to me.
> >
> 
> Nice. That's good to know Mike. :)
>  
> > Although I noticed that parser_traits.hpp appears to be 
> just a copy of 
> > the traits.hpp file (the parser constants seem to have been lost 
> > somewhere in the update).  Whether these are called 
> 'parser_traits', 
> > 'parser_consts' or anything else is fine with me =)
> > 
> 
> Yeah, I haven't gotten to chopping that file up just yet. I'm 
> still mulling around the name(s), but I think I'll just go 
> first with parser_consts or a more fine-grained approach at 
> decomposing the various constants contained in parser_traits. 
> I'll let you know when I get something in soon. :)
> 
> Thanks Mike!
> 
> --
> Dean Michael Berris
> Software Engineer, Friendster, Inc.
> <dmb...@fr...>
> +639287291459
>  
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> -----------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) 
> Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's 
> still time to save $100. 
> Use priority code J8TL2D2. 
> http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java
> .sun.com/javaone
> _______________________________________________
> Cpp-netlib-devel mailing list
> Cpp...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cpp-netlib-devel
>