Re: [cpp-netlib-devel] Implemented Rudimentary Unit Test in branch http_integration

[Michael D. <mi...@mi...>]

Hi Dean,

I haven't tried compiling anything yet since I was still working  
through the concept stage of "what goes where?"  (plus I still need to  
learn how to use bjam =)

Glad to hear that you've moved things to the next level!  I hope to  
invest some more time on it this weekend.

Take care,
-Mike


Ps. I'm still on the list, just back-logged =)


On Apr 16, 2008, at 1:28 AM, Dean Michael C. Berris wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I've made an effort to make the tests compile in the http_integration
> branch. Now we can make sure we can implement everything going forward
> with unit tests that build.
>
> I suggest that from here on out, we should strive to check in versions
> that have:
>
> 1) Unit tests written to cover as much (new) code as possible
> 2) Unit tests that at least build
> 3) In cases of unit tests that fail, it would be nice to know what
> particular problems you're encountering
>
> This is so that we can move forward in a pace that's less limiting --
> meaning we can make small changes left and right and keep everyone's
> copies "buildable" or at least "usable".
>
> Although there's not much there yet, it should be a good start.
>
> I'm CC'ing you Mike just in case you're not on the list anymore and
> would like to know what's going on. ;)
>
> In the next few days I'll be going to implement as much as I can in
> terms of unit tests -- we should be able to move forward in a better
> pace now that I'm pretty much devoted to this project as part of my
> professional endeavors. ;)
>
> Have a good day guys, and I hope this helps!
>
> --
> Dean Michael Berris
> Software Engineer, Friendster, Inc.
> <dmb...@fr...>
> +639287291459
>