Re: [cpp-netlib-devel] Review of http::message

[Dean M. C. B. <dmb...@fr...>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cpp...@li... 
> [mailto:cpp...@li...] On 
> Behalf Of Glyn Matthews
> Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2008 8:06 PM
> To: C++ Networking Library Developers Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [cpp-netlib-devel] Review of http::message
> 
> 
> Would it be possible to do something like the following:
> namespace http {
> namespace tags {
> struct message_tag {};
> struct message_tag_w {};
> }
> }
> 
> namespace http {
> namespace traits {
> template <
>     typename Tag
>     >
> struct delimiters;
> 
> 
> template <>
> struct delimiters<tags::message_tag> {
>     static char const *crlf() {
>         static const char *const crlf = "\x0D\x0A";
>         return crlf;
>     }
> };
> 
> 
> template <>
> struct delimiters<tags::message_tag_w> {
>     static wchar_t const *crlf() {
>         static const wchar_t *const crlf =  L"\x0D\x0A";
>         return crlf;
>     }
> };
> }
> }
>  

I like it. Thanks Glyn. :)

It looks like stuff that the compiler will inline anyway because it has
full type information with everything being static and all. However, it
will change the way these are accessed -- instead of just doing values,
we need to make function calls...

Perhaps it may work.

Mike, would that be too much of a trouble? I as much as possible would
like to avoid anonymous namespaces because of the ODR.

--
Dean Michael Berris
Software Engineer, Friendster, Inc.
<dmb...@fr...>
+639287291459