Re: [cpp-netlib-devel] Review of http::message

[Dean M. C. B. <dmb...@fr...>]

I'm back...

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cpp...@li... 
> [mailto:cpp...@li...] On 
> Behalf Of Dean Michael C. Berris
> Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2008 7:39 PM
> To: C++ Networking Library Developers Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [cpp-netlib-devel] Review of http::message
> 
> Hi Glyn,
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: cpp...@li...
> > [mailto:cpp...@li...] On 
> Behalf Of 
> > Glyn Matthews
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2008 7:24 PM
> > To: C++ Networking Library Developers Mailing List
> > Subject: Re: [cpp-netlib-devel] Review of http::message
> > 
> [snip code]
> > 
> > 
> > Maybe I'm missing something here, but isn't it an error to 
> initialize 
> > a static non-integral type inside a struct definition?
> 
> I actually am not yet sure myself, but given 'char const * 
> const' is essentially a pointer type (which can be considered 
> an integral type) this just might work. This is one reason 
> I'd love to have unit tests too. ;)
> 
> Let me get back to you on this, I can spike it with a compiler.
>

EEP. Yes, you're right.

So this will have to come into some unnamed namespace to be included in
every translation unit. Any other approach you can suggest? 

--
Dean Michael Berris
Software Engineer, Friendster, Inc.
<dmb...@fr...>
+639287291459