From: Dean M. B. <mik...@gm...> - 2010-05-26 07:01:11
|
Hi Everyone! I just wanted to share that I recently just got access to a Windows development machine that is way faster than my Linux development machine. I've made some changes on my branch's master which basically fixes issues encountered on MSVC 10. I have yet to fix the broken tests, but I'm thinking of releasing a 0.6.1 that addresses the MSVC issues. Tests from the Linux users would be very much appreciated. Thanks and I hope this helps! -- Dean Michael Berris deanberris.com |
From: Darren G. <dar...@gm...> - 2010-05-26 07:49:57
|
Hi Dean, On 26 May 2010 08:00, Dean Michael Berris <mik...@gm...> wrote: > > Tests from the Linux users would be very much appreciated. > Sounds good. Can you include a link please? I might be able to run the tests on linux later today. Cheers, Darren |
From: Dean M. B. <mik...@gm...> - 2010-05-26 07:54:40
|
Hi Darren! On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Darren Garvey <dar...@gm...> wrote: > Hi Dean, > > On 26 May 2010 08:00, Dean Michael Berris <mik...@gm...> wrote: >> >> Tests from the Linux users would be very much appreciated. > > Sounds good. Can you include a link please? I might be able to run the tests > on linux later today. > Sorry about that, I was assuming everyone knew. :) http://github.com/mikhailberis/cpp-netlib -- you can clone the git repository or get a fork of your own on github too and fix things in case I broke anything on your fork, then ask me to pull you changes if there are any required. If any part is unclear please let me know so that I can respond soon as I can. > Cheers, Thanks and have a great day! -- Dean Michael Berris deanberris.com |
From: Jeroen H. <vex...@gm...> - 2010-05-26 08:07:08
|
On 26 May 2010 09:54, Dean Michael Berris <mik...@gm...> wrote: > Hi Darren! > > On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Darren Garvey <dar...@gm...> wrote: >> Hi Dean, >> >> On 26 May 2010 08:00, Dean Michael Berris <mik...@gm...> wrote: >>> >>> Tests from the Linux users would be very much appreciated. >> >> Sounds good. Can you include a link please? I might be able to run the tests >> on linux later today. >> > > Sorry about that, I was assuming everyone knew. :) > > http://github.com/mikhailberis/cpp-netlib -- you can clone the git > repository or get a fork of your own on github too and fix things in > case I broke anything on your fork, then ask me to pull you changes if > there are any required. > > If any part is unclear please let me know so that I can respond soon as I can. > >> Cheers, > > Thanks and have a great day! > > -- > Dean Michael Berris > deanberris.com > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Hi guys, Great to see some activity on this list again. I've recently bought a MacBook Pro, thus I can test the code on an OS X machine. Regards, Jeroen |
From: Dean M. B. <mik...@gm...> - 2010-05-26 08:13:07
|
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Jeroen Habraken <vex...@gm...> wrote: > > Hi guys, > > Great to see some activity on this list again. I've recently bought a > MacBook Pro, thus I can test the code on an OS X machine. > Oh that's just perfect! Let me know if you have any findings too, and of course, patches are welcome. :) BTW, if you're feeling a little adventurous, you might want to try out building cpp-netlib tests with clang++ as well -- patches to the Jamfile or the CMakeLists file would be greatly appreciated to fix issues on OSX. Thanks again and I look forward to updates from you soon! :) -- Dean Michael Berris deanberris.com |
From: Glyn M. <gly...@gm...> - 2010-05-26 08:15:48
|
On 26 May 2010 09:00, Dean Michael Berris <mik...@gm...> wrote: > Hi Everyone! > > I just wanted to share that I recently just got access to a Windows > development machine that is way faster than my Linux development > machine. I've made some changes on my branch's master which basically > fixes issues encountered on MSVC 10. I have yet to fix the broken > tests, but I'm thinking of releasing a 0.6.1 that addresses the MSVC > issues. > > Tests from the Linux users would be very much appreciated. > > Thanks and I hope this helps! > > I can't verify this on Linux until I get home this evening, but you might want to also update the header boost/network/version.hpp Thanks, Glyn |
From: Darren G. <dar...@gm...> - 2010-05-26 08:16:40
|
On 26 May 2010 08:54, Dean Michael Berris <mik...@gm...> wrote: > Hi Darren! > > On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Darren Garvey <dar...@gm...> > wrote: > > Hi Dean, > > > > On 26 May 2010 08:00, Dean Michael Berris <mik...@gm...> > wrote: > >> > >> Tests from the Linux users would be very much appreciated. > > > > Sounds good. Can you include a link please? I might be able to run the > tests > > on linux later today. > > > > Sorry about that, I was assuming everyone knew. :) > I used to have it, but I've formatted my machine recently! > http://github.com/mikhailberis/cpp-netlib -- you can clone the git > repository or get a fork of your own on github too and fix things in > case I broke anything on your fork, then ask me to pull you changes if > there are any required. > > If any part is unclear please let me know so that I can respond soon as I > can. > Sounds fine to me, I'll let you know how I get on. Cheers, Darren |
From: Dean M. B. <mik...@gm...> - 2010-05-26 08:19:01
|
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 4:16 PM, Darren Garvey <dar...@gm...> wrote: > On 26 May 2010 08:54, Dean Michael Berris <mik...@gm...> wrote: >> >> Sorry about that, I was assuming everyone knew. :) > > I used to have it, but I've formatted my machine recently! > Ah, yes, I remember how that feels. :) >> >> http://github.com/mikhailberis/cpp-netlib -- you can clone the git >> repository or get a fork of your own on github too and fix things in >> case I broke anything on your fork, then ask me to pull you changes if >> there are any required. >> >> If any part is unclear please let me know so that I can respond soon as I >> can. > > Sounds fine to me, I'll let you know how I get on. > Cool, looking forward to your findings. :) -- Dean Michael Berris deanberris.com |
From: Dean M. B. <mik...@gm...> - 2010-05-26 08:19:51
|
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Glyn Matthews <gly...@gm...> wrote: > > I can't verify this on Linux until I get home this evening, but you might > want to also update the header boost/network/version.hpp Ah, cool, I'll do that. :) > Thanks, Thanks too Glyn! -- Dean Michael Berris deanberris.com |
From: Jeroen H. <vex...@gm...> - 2010-05-26 08:50:59
|
On 26 May 2010 10:19, Dean Michael Berris <mik...@gm...> wrote: > On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Glyn Matthews <gly...@gm...> wrote: >> >> I can't verify this on Linux until I get home this evening, but you might >> want to also update the header boost/network/version.hpp > > Ah, cool, I'll do that. :) > >> Thanks, > > Thanks too Glyn! > > -- > Dean Michael Berris > deanberris.com > I have some serious boost::spirit errors scrolling over my screen, oh how I missed them. If possible I'll have a look at them tonight, but long story short, the current trunk unfortunately doesn't build on my Mac. Jeroen |
From: Glyn M. <gly...@gm...> - 2010-05-26 09:08:35
|
On 26 May 2010 10:50, Jeroen Habraken <vex...@gm...> wrote: > On 26 May 2010 10:19, Dean Michael Berris <mik...@gm...> wrote: > > On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Glyn Matthews <gly...@gm...> > wrote: > >> > >> I can't verify this on Linux until I get home this evening, but you > might > >> want to also update the header boost/network/version.hpp > > > > Ah, cool, I'll do that. :) > > > >> Thanks, > > > > Thanks too Glyn! > > > > -- > > Dean Michael Berris > > deanberris.com > > > > I have some serious boost::spirit errors scrolling over my screen, oh > how I missed them. If possible I'll have a look at them tonight, but > long story short, the current trunk unfortunately doesn't build on my > Mac. > > Jeroen > > Would these have anything to do with changes to boost::spirit::traits::transform_attribute ? I think this has been updated on the boost trunk (it takes a new template parameter): http://svn.boost.org/svn/boost/trunk/boost/spirit/home/support/attributes.hpp G |
From: Dean M. B. <mik...@gm...> - 2010-05-26 09:08:16
|
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Jeroen Habraken <vex...@gm...> wrote: > > I have some serious boost::spirit errors scrolling over my screen, oh > how I missed them. If possible I'll have a look at them tonight, but > long story short, the current trunk unfortunately doesn't build on my > Mac. > Oh, I'm sorry, I forgot to tell you that you need Boost's SVN trunk. There were a few changes that needed to be done to the transform thingy. Are you building against trunk? :D -- Dean Michael Berris deanberris.com |
From: Jeroen H. <vex...@gm...> - 2010-05-26 09:17:29
|
On 26 May 2010 11:07, Dean Michael Berris <mik...@gm...> wrote: > On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Jeroen Habraken <vex...@gm...> wrote: >> >> I have some serious boost::spirit errors scrolling over my screen, oh >> how I missed them. If possible I'll have a look at them tonight, but >> long story short, the current trunk unfortunately doesn't build on my >> Mac. >> > > Oh, I'm sorry, I forgot to tell you that you need Boost's SVN trunk. > There were a few changes that needed to be done to the transform > thingy. > > Are you building against trunk? :D > > -- > Dean Michael Berris > deanberris.com > No I wasn't (I was building against 1.43.0), let me give trunk a shot. Jeroen |
From: Jeroen H. <vex...@gm...> - 2010-05-26 10:07:32
|
On 26 May 2010 11:16, Jeroen Habraken <vex...@gm...> wrote: > On 26 May 2010 11:07, Dean Michael Berris <mik...@gm...> wrote: >> On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Jeroen Habraken <vex...@gm...> wrote: >>> >>> I have some serious boost::spirit errors scrolling over my screen, oh >>> how I missed them. If possible I'll have a look at them tonight, but >>> long story short, the current trunk unfortunately doesn't build on my >>> Mac. >>> >> >> Oh, I'm sorry, I forgot to tell you that you need Boost's SVN trunk. >> There were a few changes that needed to be done to the transform >> thingy. >> >> Are you building against trunk? :D >> >> -- >> Dean Michael Berris >> deanberris.com >> > > No I wasn't (I was building against 1.43.0), let me give trunk a shot. > > Jeroen > That did the trick, but I'd really like to keep the URI code compatible with a boost release (at least 1.43.0, but preferably further back), what's your take on this? Jeroen |
From: Dean M. B. <mik...@gm...> - 2010-05-26 10:15:19
|
That should be fine, but the problem we have with that is that we depend on transform_action, which has been changed on the trunk. This is in master at the moment and will only matter when Spirit is released with the next Boost version. If you know the correct macros to use to choose the correct behavior with Spirit, feel free to hack on it. :) Dean Michael Berris Sent from my Android G1 On May 26, 2010 6:07 PM, "Jeroen Habraken" <vex...@gm...> wrote: On 26 May 2010 11:16, Jeroen Habraken <vex...@gm...> wrote: > On 26 May 2010 11:07, Dean Micha... That did the trick, but I'd really like to keep the URI code compatible with a boost release (at least 1.43.0, but preferably further back), what's your take on this? Jeroen ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ___________... |
From: Nelson, E. - 2 <eri...@ba...> - 2010-05-26 15:06:40
|
Jeroen Habraken wrote: > That did the trick, but I'd really like to keep the URI code > compatible with a boost release (at least 1.43.0, but preferably > further back), what's your take on this? +1 from me... there's no way my project can depend on a non-released boost. Erik |
From: Nelson, E. - 2 <eri...@ba...> - 2010-05-26 15:22:01
|
Dean Michael Berris wrote: > I just wanted to share that I recently just got access to a Windows > development machine that is way faster than my Linux development > machine. I've made some changes on my branch's master which basically > fixes issues encountered on MSVC 10. I have yet to fix the broken > tests, but I'm thinking of releasing a 0.6.1 that addresses the MSVC > issues. Yay! More people building on Windows can only help cpp-netlib's portability. Erik |
From: Glyn M. <gly...@gm...> - 2010-05-26 18:05:55
|
On 26 May 2010 17:04, Nelson, Erik - 2 <eri...@ba...>wrote: > Jeroen Habraken wrote: > > > That did the trick, but I'd really like to keep the URI code > > compatible with a boost release (at least 1.43.0, but preferably > > further back), what's your take on this? > > +1 from me... there's no way my project can depend on a non-released > boost. > +1 from me too on compatibility with official releases; it would be difficult to promote cpp-netlib if it's a constant moving target. I'd even prefer compatibility with older releases too. Otherwise I can report that all tests pass on gcc 4.4.3 on ubuntu linux 10.04 against boost trunk. G |
From: Dean M. B. <mik...@gm...> - 2010-05-27 02:52:28
|
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 2:05 AM, Glyn Matthews <gly...@gm...> wrote: > > On 26 May 2010 17:04, Nelson, Erik - 2 <eri...@ba...> > wrote: >> >> Jeroen Habraken wrote: >> >> > That did the trick, but I'd really like to keep the URI code >> > compatible with a boost release (at least 1.43.0, but preferably >> > further back), what's your take on this? >> >> +1 from me... there's no way my project can depend on a non-released >> boost. > > +1 from me too on compatibility with official releases; it would be > difficult to promote cpp-netlib if it's a constant moving target. I'd even > prefer compatibility with older releases too. Oh all right... :P FWIW, the code in master was changed with the appropriate spirit macro checks for versions. I would bug someone on the Spirit team to update the version in the trunk so that we can switch on the version appropriately. > Otherwise I can report that all tests pass on gcc 4.4.3 on ubuntu linux > 10.04 against boost trunk. Cool! Thanks Glyn! :) -- Dean Michael Berris deanberris.com |