cpp-netlib-devel

[cpp-netlib-devel] Merging http_integration to Trunk

[Dean M. B. <mik...@gm...>]

Hi Everyone,

I'm currently in the process of setting up my OpenSolaris 2008.05
Virtual Machine (using VirtualBox from Sun Microsystems) and in a
while once I get it set up and updated to the latest, I should be able
to merge http_integration and docs to trunk.

Before I do so though, I'd like to ask if:

1. There are any outstanding issues we need to address before I merge
to trunk and tag 0.3
2. There have been and updates to documentation that needs mention
3. There are any objections to the merge

I'll rename the 'clear_cache()' method to 'clear_resolved_cache()'
before doing the merge -- and after a round of testing, I should be
able to merge with no hitches.

Let me know if you need anything specifically merged in before I release 0.3.

Have a good day everyone, and I hope to hear from you real soon. ;-)

-- 
Dean Michael C. Berris
Software Engineer, Friendster, Inc.

Re: [cpp-netlib-devel] Merging http_integration to Trunk

[Glyn M. <gly...@gm...>]

Hi Dean,

2008/9/15 Dean Michael Berris <mik...@gm...>

> Hi Everyone,
>
> I'm currently in the process of setting up my OpenSolaris 2008.05
> Virtual Machine (using VirtualBox from Sun Microsystems) and in a
> while once I get it set up and updated to the latest, I should be able
> to merge http_integration and docs to trunk.
>
> Before I do so though, I'd like to ask if:
>
> 1. There are any outstanding issues we need to address before I merge
> to trunk and tag 0.3

Not that I see.


>
> 2. There have been and updates to documentation that needs mention

I haven't made any updates to the documentation.


>
> 3. There are any objections to the merge
>
Not from me.

If you need anything from me, let me know.
G

Re: [cpp-netlib-devel] Merging http_integration to Trunk

[Dean M. B. <mik...@gm...>]

Hi Glyn,

On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 2:39 AM, Glyn Matthews <gly...@gm...> wrote:
>
> 2008/9/15 Dean Michael Berris <mik...@gm...>
>>
>>
>> 1. There are any outstanding issues we need to address before I merge
>> to trunk and tag 0.3
>
> Not that I see.
>

Great. :)

>>
>> 2. There have been and updates to documentation that needs mention
>
> I haven't made any updates to the documentation.
>

Okay, I think I have to make some changes to the discussion regarding
the HTTP client. The documentation should reflect the new constructor
options and new method added to the HTTP Client.

>>
>> 3. There are any objections to the merge
>
> Not from me.
>

Thanks. :)

> If you need anything from me, let me know.

I will. Thanks again Glyn!

-- 
Dean Michael C. Berris
Software Engineer, Friendster, Inc.

Re: [cpp-netlib-devel] Merging http_integration to Trunk

[Glyn M. <gly...@gm...>]

Dean,

2008/9/16 Dean Michael Berris <mik...@gm...>

> Hi Glyn,
>
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 2:39 AM, Glyn Matthews <gly...@gm...>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> 2. There have been and updates to documentation that needs mention
> >
> > I haven't made any updates to the documentation.
> >
>
> Okay, I think I have to make some changes to the discussion regarding
> the HTTP client. The documentation should reflect the new constructor
> options and new method added to the HTTP Client.


OK.  I'd like to add some further explanation about the design decision to
use tags and directives (I intended to do this even before Kim brought it up
on another thread), but I don't have time to do it this week and I'll leave
it for 0.4.

Regard,
Glyn