Menu
▾
▴
cpp-netlib-devel
|
From: Divye K. <div...@gm...> - 2008-08-10 16:14:08
|
Dear admins, The sole patch entry in our database can be safely said to have been resolved as suitable tests have been added and the code modified accordingly. I request the admins to mark the issue closed. url: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?atid=958385&group_id=196670&func=browse Also, as we are now able to support GET requests and have tests for the same, I would also request that our project status be changed to "alpha" from the current "planning" stage. Divye -- An idealist is one who, on noticing that a rose smells better than a cabbage, concludes that it will also make better soup. H. L. Mencken (1880 - 1956) My official web site: http://people.iitr.ernet.in/shp/061305/ Webmaster: http://www.drkapoorsclinic.com Blog: http://divyekapoor.blogspot.com |
|
From: Dean M. B. <mik...@gm...> - 2008-08-10 16:48:38
|
Hi Divye, On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 12:14 AM, Divye Kapoor <div...@gm...> wrote: > Dear admins, > The sole patch entry in our database can be safely said to have been > resolved as suitable tests have been added and the code modified > accordingly. I request the admins to mark the issue closed. > > url: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?atid=958385&group_id=196670&func=browse > Thanks. :D > Also, as we are now able to support GET requests and have tests for the > same, I would also request that our project status be changed to "alpha" > from the current "planning" stage. > I like that. Do we agree yet Glyn? :D -- Dean Michael C. Berris Software Engineer, Friendster, Inc. |
|
From: Glyn M. <gly...@gm...> - 2008-08-10 20:30:29
|
Hello, 2008/8/10 Dean Michael Berris <mik...@gm...> > > > Also, as we are now able to support GET requests and have tests for the > > same, I would also request that our project status be changed to "alpha" > > from the current "planning" stage. > > > > I like that. Do we agree yet Glyn? :D > Maybe, though I'm still concerned by a lack of examples and a lack of documentation. I'm afraid I still haven't had the time to look thoroughly enough through the code to comment on how complete it is. Dean, if you're comfortable with changing the status, then go ahead. I'll make an effort to go through the latest round of changes and make comments. Regards, Glyn |
|
From: Dean M. B. <mik...@gm...> - 2008-08-11 01:40:34
|
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 4:30 AM, Glyn Matthews <gly...@gm...> wrote: > Hello, > > 2008/8/10 Dean Michael Berris <mik...@gm...> >> >> > Also, as we are now able to support GET requests and have tests for the >> > same, I would also request that our project status be changed to "alpha" >> > from the current "planning" stage. >> > >> >> I like that. Do we agree yet Glyn? :D > > Maybe, though I'm still concerned by a lack of examples and a lack of > documentation. I'm afraid I still haven't had the time to look thoroughly > enough through the code to comment on how complete it is. Dean, if you're > comfortable with changing the status, then go ahead. I'll make an effort to > go through the latest round of changes and make comments. > Right, the hard part is still missing. :-P I can come up with simple examples, that's no problem -- it's just code anyway. ;-) But documentation is something else entirely. I don't feel comfortable writing documentation on an incomplete implementation, but if anybody wants to pick that up -- and take hints from the unit tests -- then I'm all for it. Come to think of it, unless we have either examples or documentation, I don't think users will even trust an Alpha version that doesn't have proper (or even improper) documentation. So let's hold that off until we get some decent documentation and examples out. :-) Divye/Allister, care to work on the documentation part? :-D -- Dean Michael C. Berris Software Engineer, Friendster, Inc. |
|
From: Glyn M. <gly...@gm...> - 2008-08-11 10:35:01
|
Hi, 2008/8/11 Dean Michael Berris <mik...@gm...> > > Come to think of it, unless we have either examples or documentation, > I don't think users will even trust an Alpha version that doesn't have > proper (or even improper) documentation. So let's hold that off until > we get some decent documentation and examples out. :-) > Right, that was my point. The more examples the better (they would also reveal potential problems with the code), and it would be a good idea to have examples to demonstrate why using this library is an improvement on, say, the HTTP example given with Asio. Also, I don't think its right to say we have an alpha while having GET but not having POST, PUT and DELETE: it is simply incomplete. > > Divye/Allister, care to work on the documentation part? :-D > I can take more responsibility for the documentation - I could always do with improving my technical writing skills :) Regards, Glyn |
|
From: Dean M. B. <mik...@gm...> - 2008-08-11 15:40:43
|
Hi Glyn! On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 6:34 PM, Glyn Matthews <gly...@gm...> wrote: > Hi, > > 2008/8/11 Dean Michael Berris <mik...@gm...> >> >> Come to think of it, unless we have either examples or documentation, >> I don't think users will even trust an Alpha version that doesn't have >> proper (or even improper) documentation. So let's hold that off until >> we get some decent documentation and examples out. :-) > > Right, that was my point. The more examples the better (they would also > reveal potential problems with the code), and it would be a good idea to > have examples to demonstrate why using this library is an improvement on, > say, the HTTP example given with Asio. > Sounds good to me. I'll try to come up with a command-line analog to wget. That should be a convincing example. ;-) > Also, I don't think its right to say we have an alpha while having GET but > not having POST, PUT and DELETE: it is simply incomplete. > But we not have POST, PUT, DELETE, and HEAD support. :D >> >> Divye/Allister, care to work on the documentation part? :-D > > I can take more responsibility for the documentation - I could always do > with improving my technical writing skills :) > Sounds good to me. :D -- Dean Michael C. Berris Software Engineer, Friendster, Inc. |
|
From: Allister L. S. <all...@gm...> - 2008-08-11 10:44:45
|
Hi, Divye/Allister, care to work on the documentation part? :-D > I'll have a look at Boost Book later when I get time. Some technical writing would be interesting :-) Maybe I'll come up with something tonight. But for now, I gotta get back to the day job first, hehehe... Cheers, Allister |
|
From: Divye K. <div...@gm...> - 2008-08-11 13:43:26
|
Hi, > Divye/Allister, care to work on the documentation part? :-D >> > > I'll have a look at Boost Book later when I get time. Some technical > writing would be interesting :-) > Maybe I'll come up with something tonight. But for now, I gotta get back > to the day job first, hehehe... > I have a some quickbook documentation. I'll try to get it going. Divye -- An idealist is one who, on noticing that a rose smells better than a cabbage, concludes that it will also make better soup. H. L. Mencken (1880 - 1956) My official web site: http://people.iitr.ernet.in/shp/061305/ Webmaster: http://www.drkapoorsclinic.com Blog: http://divyekapoor.blogspot.com |
|
From: Dean M. C. B. <dmb...@fr...> - 2008-08-11 16:18:50
|
> -----Original Message----- > From: cpp...@li... > [mailto:cpp...@li...] On > Behalf Of Dean Michael Berris > Sent: Monday, August 11, 2008 11:41 PM > To: C++ Networking Library Developers Mailing List > Subject: Re: [cpp-netlib-devel] Closing of bug/patch issue > > On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 6:34 PM, Glyn Matthews > <gly...@gm...> wrote: > > > > Also, I don't think its right to say we have an alpha while > having GET > > but not having POST, PUT and DELETE: it is simply incomplete. > > > > But we not have POST, PUT, DELETE, and HEAD support. :D > Of course I meant we *do* now support the following: - GET - HEAD - PUT - POST - DELETE In the client implementation in branch http_integration. :D -- Dean Michael Berris Software Engineer, Friendster, Inc. |
|
From: Glyn M. <gly...@gm...> - 2008-08-11 16:22:44
|
2008/8/11 Dean Michael C. Berris <dmb...@fr...> > > Of course I meant we *do* now support the following: > - GET > - HEAD > - PUT > - POST > - DELETE > > In the client implementation in branch http_integration. :D > Yes, I see now :) Glad to see you making such fast progress. G |
|
From: Dean M. B. <mik...@gm...> - 2008-08-11 17:05:21
|
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 12:22 AM, Glyn Matthews <gly...@gm...> wrote: > 2008/8/11 Dean Michael C. Berris <dmb...@fr...> >> >> Of course I meant we *do* now support the following: >> - GET >> - HEAD >> - PUT >> - POST >> - DELETE >> >> In the client implementation in branch http_integration. :D > > Yes, I see now :) Glad to see you making such fast progress. Me too. :D -- Dean Michael C. Berris Software Engineer, Friendster, Inc. |
×
Want the latest updates on software, tech news, and AI?
Get latest updates about software, tech news, and AI from SourceForge directly in your inbox once a month.
Thanks for helping keep SourceForge clean.
X