|
From: Jim K. <jrk...@li...> - 1999-12-24 20:50:29
|
"Frank V. Castellucci" wrote: > I made the changes I spoke of. > > I noticed something as well, in reading the process document I saw that > all Requirements will be discussed for acceptance while I am merrily > adding the Pattern requirements as though they are approved. I think > they are squarley in the target of the CoreLinux++ goals but...let me > know any objections. > > Of the current requirements, listed in the Forum, I DON'T think we have > implicit approval for: > > Persistence > Java Proxy and JVM Interface > Meta Class > Directory and Names > Smart Pointers > Herbrand Domains > Class Context > > only because we all might not have an understanding as to "What they > mean" and "Why do we want them". > > Happy Holidays > > -- > Frank V. Castellucci > > _______________________________________________ > Corelinux-public mailing list > Cor...@li... > http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/corelinux-public I had noticed that there were several requirements in the forum, but I thought that those had been approved before my participation in the project. I'll look at them more closely. I am sure that they are all reasonable requirements, and I am also sure that I may not understand all of them. JimKoontz jrk...@us... |