|
From: Frank V. C. <fr...@co...> - 1999-12-23 15:20:38
|
I made the changes I spoke of. I noticed something as well, in reading the process document I saw that all Requirements will be discussed for acceptance while I am merrily adding the Pattern requirements as though they are approved. I think they are squarley in the target of the CoreLinux++ goals but...let me know any objections. Of the current requirements, listed in the Forum, I DON'T think we have implicit approval for: Persistence Java Proxy and JVM Interface Meta Class Directory and Names Smart Pointers Herbrand Domains Class Context only because we all might not have an understanding as to "What they mean" and "Why do we want them". Happy Holidays -- Frank V. Castellucci |